LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > LQ Suggestions & Feedback
User Name
Password
LQ Suggestions & Feedback Do you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-15-2010, 06:28 AM   #1
girarde
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2007
Distribution: OpenBSD
Posts: 72

Rep: Reputation: 23
Zero-reply count in BSD, was: The (un?)helpfulness of the BSD Community


I clicked the Zero Replies link recently to see what was being ignored. There were 327 threads that did not have a single reply.

None of them were in the BSD forum.
 
Old 10-15-2010, 06:37 AM   #2
eyerobot
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Location: Holland, Michigan USA
Distribution: Kubuntu 8.04
Posts: 9
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 1
It seems that you may have misnamed your post.
I suggest The helpfulness of the BSD Community, Since BSD seems to be a popular place to get replies.
Just a thought.
 
Old 10-15-2010, 06:38 AM   #3
GrapefruiTgirl
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: underground
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 7,594

Rep: Reputation: 556Reputation: 556Reputation: 556Reputation: 556Reputation: 556Reputation: 556
Hi there!

I don't understand the thread title vs the post body - how might that zero-reply situation imply unhelpfulness? I'd have thought the opposite - if there are no zero-replies, then either the community is very helpful, or nobody has questions.
 
Old 10-15-2010, 08:55 AM   #4
David1357
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2007
Location: South Carolina, U.S.A.
Distribution: Ubuntu, Fedora Core, Red Hat, SUSE, Gentoo, DSL, coLinux, uClinux
Posts: 1,302
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 107Reputation: 107
Quote:
Originally Posted by girarde View Post
None of them were in the BSD forum.
It looks like you have stumbled across a defect in the code that displays the posts with zero replies. A quick look at
LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Other *NIX Forums > *BSD
shows several zero reply posts.
 
Old 10-15-2010, 09:12 AM   #5
forrestt
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Cary, NC, USA
Distribution: Fedora, Kubuntu, RedHat, CentOS, SuSe
Posts: 1,288

Rep: Reputation: 99
It is definitely a bug. If you look at the *BSD forum, the first 0 reply bug is dated 9-25-2010. If you then do a zero reply search, and go to the portion of the search list that contains that date, that particular bug is not listed.

Forrest
 
Old 10-15-2010, 09:19 AM   #6
GrapefruiTgirl
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: underground
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 7,594

Rep: Reputation: 556Reputation: 556Reputation: 556Reputation: 556Reputation: 556Reputation: 556
What I wonder, is (assuming a bug) maybe the forum name "*BSD" is causing a problem with the zero-reply code, because of the "*" character.

Reporting this for a possible move to "Suggestions + Feedback".
 
Old 10-15-2010, 11:03 AM   #7
jlliagre
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Outside Paris
Distribution: Solaris 11.4, Oracle Linux, Mint, Debian/WSL
Posts: 9,789

Rep: Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by forrestt View Post
It is definitely a bug. If you look at the *BSD forum, the first 0 reply bug is dated 9-25-2010. If you then do a zero reply search, and go to the portion of the search list that contains that date, that particular bug is not listed.
I don't think there is any bug with the *BSD forum. That particular posting does appear in the zero reply list. You misread its date which is September the 25th, not 23rd.
 
Old 10-15-2010, 12:17 PM   #8
forrestt
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Cary, NC, USA
Distribution: Fedora, Kubuntu, RedHat, CentOS, SuSe
Posts: 1,288

Rep: Reputation: 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlliagre View Post
I don't think there is any bug with the *BSD forum. That particular posting does appear in the zero reply list. You misread its date which is September the 25th, not 23rd.
You are correct. My apologies.

Forrest
 
Old 10-15-2010, 01:48 PM   #9
girarde
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2007
Distribution: OpenBSD
Posts: 72

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 23
The (un?) was ironic.
 
Old 10-24-2010, 05:52 AM   #10
hughetorrance
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: London North West
Distribution: x86_64 Slack 13.37 current : +others
Posts: 459

Rep: Reputation: 59
As it happens the BSD forums are typically just like the Linux ones...people ask questions that really just raise more questions...every community likes pertinent intuitive inquiries,what they don,t like is a question that takes as long to answer as it originally took them to find out the answer. LOL
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: PC BSD 8.0 release made BSD much easier for desktop use | Installation and scre LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 02-26-2010 08:30 AM
PC BSD, Open BSD, or Free BSD ? Alexvader *BSD 5 02-08-2010 12:40 AM
Video For BSD --- New project to develop V4L compatible drivers for BSD Fritz_Katz *BSD 5 07-19-2008 11:53 PM
BSD Community? Crashed_Again General 10 04-05-2005 05:46 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > LQ Suggestions & Feedback

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:58 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration