LinuxQuestions.org
Register a domain and help support LQ
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > LQ Suggestions & Feedback
User Name
Password
LQ Suggestions & Feedback Do you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 07-23-2008, 07:21 AM   #1
resetreset
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: India
Distribution: Dynebolic, Ubuntu 10.10
Posts: 1,320

Rep: Reputation: 62
You shouldn't be able to edit a post AFTER someone has replied to it!!!


as it says....
 
Old 07-23-2008, 07:36 AM   #2
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,415

Rep: Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968
why not? nothing wrong with correcting links and spelling etc... that sort of thing has to be left down to individuals understanding how to use a forum correctly.
 
Old 07-23-2008, 07:38 AM   #3
XavierP
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Lubuntu
Posts: 19,176
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430
The fast moving nature of the board means that you can often get an almost instant answer. If, after posting, you realise you left out a vital piece of info, even though someone has responded it's good to edit the post.
 
Old 07-23-2008, 08:21 AM   #4
pixellany
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Distribution: Arch/XFCE
Posts: 17,802

Rep: Reputation: 729Reputation: 729Reputation: 729Reputation: 729Reputation: 729Reputation: 729Reputation: 729
If I make a mistake on a post, I will correct it in a way that does not upset the logical flow of the thread. Let's not make more rules and gimmicks to protect ourselves from every bit of bad behavior.
 
Old 07-23-2008, 08:48 AM   #5
Vit77
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Distribution: Mandriva, RHEL, Mageia, SuSE
Posts: 132

Rep: Reputation: 17
resetreset, developing your position, we would need to lock all ever viewed once posts, because someone could start replying already...
I'm afraid, it could bring more difficulties than benefit.

However, I think we have to support all the attemts to make the forum better. Thanks, resetreset.
 
Old 08-07-2008, 03:32 AM   #6
Mega Man X
Guru
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: ~
Distribution: Ubuntu, FreeBSD, Solaris, DSL
Posts: 5,339

Rep: Reputation: 63
There are some idiots (this is the best word I could come up with here, but you will soon see it is fairly accurate) who tries to delete their posts after getting an answer. Since deleting is not allowed, they simply remove their text, making the thread completely worthless. These kind of users are one in a million, but if I could, I'd kick them in the nuts...

So my suggestion is, always "quote" somebody before replying. You never know when or where one of those idiots will be posting...
 
Old 08-07-2008, 04:15 AM   #7
XavierP
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Lubuntu
Posts: 19,176
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mega Man X View Post
There are some idiots (this is the best word I could come up with here, but you will soon see it is fairly accurate) who tries to delete their posts after getting an answer. Since deleting is not allowed, they simply remove their text, making the thread completely worthless. These kind of users are one in a million, but if I could, I'd kick them in the nuts...

So my suggestion is, always "quote" somebody before replying. You never know when or where one of those idiots will be posting...
Good idea
 
Old 08-07-2008, 04:27 AM   #8
jschiwal
Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Fargo, ND
Distribution: SuSE AMD64
Posts: 15,733

Rep: Reputation: 655Reputation: 655Reputation: 655Reputation: 655Reputation: 655Reputation: 655
A few times someone has pointed out a mistake. I'll thank them and mention that I've subsequently made a correction. If someone reads the post later, such as the result of a search, they will read the corrected post.

Often I'll notice a mistake just after posting. Someone might submit a post as I'm editing. Also, there is a line that mentions that the post was edited, alerting readers to that fact.
 
Old 08-07-2008, 05:10 AM   #9
Mega Man X
Guru
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: ~
Distribution: Ubuntu, FreeBSD, Solaris, DSL
Posts: 5,339

Rep: Reputation: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by XavierP View Post
Good idea
Lol, didn't see that coming
 
Old 08-07-2008, 05:57 AM   #10
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware & Slackware64 14.1
Posts: 7,139
Blog Entries: 52

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mega Man X View Post
So my suggestion is, always "quote" somebody before replying. You never know when or where one of those idiots will be posting...
Couldn't have put it better myself.
 
Old 08-07-2008, 08:59 AM   #11
pixellany
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Distribution: Arch/XFCE
Posts: 17,802

Rep: Reputation: 729Reputation: 729Reputation: 729Reputation: 729Reputation: 729Reputation: 729Reputation: 729
I'm working on a book: "Finding a Cure for Stupidity---the Implications for Society".

Seriously, please don't start "idiot-proofing" this forum. Better to think of constructive things for OP to work on---he/she appears to have a lot of energy and enthusiasm......
 
Old 08-07-2008, 10:47 AM   #12
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware & Slackware64 14.1
Posts: 7,139
Blog Entries: 52

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Finding a Cure for Stupidity? Bet I could find the Holy Grail quicker.
 
Old 08-07-2008, 10:56 AM   #13
trickykid
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,133

Rep: Reputation: 199Reputation: 199
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mega Man X View Post
Lol, didn't see that coming
I think XavierP was referring to kicking them in the nuts part of your reply..
 
Old 08-07-2008, 08:35 PM   #14
David the H.
Bash Guru
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Osaka, Japan
Distribution: Debian sid + kde 3.5 & 4.4
Posts: 6,823

Rep: Reputation: 1950Reputation: 1950Reputation: 1950Reputation: 1950Reputation: 1950Reputation: 1950Reputation: 1950Reputation: 1950Reputation: 1950Reputation: 1950Reputation: 1950
Another good practice is to make it clear in your edited post that you've changed something, similar to how good coders include a changelog in their code.

Whenever I edit a post (other than for minor fix-ups), I generally also insert a line saying "edit: changed xxx to yyy" or something like that at the bottom. Alternately, I'll also occasionally keep the original content as-is, then insert an "edit:" line with the updated information right after it, depending on just what's being changed.

Either way, it makes it clear not only that something has changed, but what's been changed.
 
Old 08-08-2008, 08:56 AM   #15
archtoad6
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Houston, TX (usa)
Distribution: MEPIS, Debian, Knoppix,
Posts: 4,727
Blog Entries: 15

Rep: Reputation: 231Reputation: 231Reputation: 231
I really hate the clutter introduced by quoting & potentially re-quoting everything. If we're going to do that, we might as well have a good old mailing list, & arguments over top- vs. bottom- posting.

I really, really hate that clutter; but I have to agree that is a way to deal w/ the idiots (I agree, that is the right thing to call them) who thoughtlessly destroy their posts w/o regard to those who come after. This is one time when I think that the cure is worse than the disease. I see very very few instances of this problem, but the suggestion would mean possibly doubling the size of the disk storage necessary to hold LQ, doubling the bandwidth necessary -- both for LQ & us the subscribers -- to d/l any given thread to read it, as well as doubling the time spent waiting for the thread to d/l. On a slow 'Net day that extra time could be annoying to say the least.

Is it possible instead to restore & lock such posts? -- 1st, is it technically possible w/in the vBulletin s/w? 2nd, is it too much to ask of our moderators to assume this task?
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cannot edit a post sometimes taylor_venable LQ Suggestions & Feedback 2 06-10-2008 10:07 AM
Can I edit the subject line in my own post? arjay LQ Suggestions & Feedback 5 06-24-2006 03:23 PM
post edit removes newlines dogpatch LQ Suggestions & Feedback 14 02-05-2006 02:45 PM
edit post / reply acting funny? bobbens LQ Suggestions & Feedback 11 01-19-2006 12:59 PM
Edit post: preview edits jonaskoelker LQ Suggestions & Feedback 3 09-01-2005 09:52 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:58 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration