LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-27-2016, 12:13 PM   #31
cwizardone
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Distribution: Slackware64-current with "True Multilib" and KDE4Town.
Posts: 9,085

Rep: Reputation: 7262Reputation: 7262Reputation: 7262Reputation: 7262Reputation: 7262Reputation: 7262Reputation: 7262Reputation: 7262Reputation: 7262Reputation: 7262Reputation: 7262

Quote:
Originally Posted by cynwulf View Post
.....If it wasn't for MS you probably would not have all this cheaply available x86 hardware to install your OS on...
Could be, but I've always thought it had more to do with IBM deciding to use readily available third market parts to build their first two or three generations of personal computers.
 
Old 10-27-2016, 05:08 PM   #32
TB0ne
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Distribution: SuSE, RedHat, Slack,CentOS
Posts: 26,613

Rep: Reputation: 7962Reputation: 7962Reputation: 7962Reputation: 7962Reputation: 7962Reputation: 7962Reputation: 7962Reputation: 7962Reputation: 7962Reputation: 7962Reputation: 7962
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwizardone View Post
Could be, but I've always thought it had more to do with IBM deciding to use readily available third market parts to build their first two or three generations of personal computers.
It wasn't JUST that. I remember the first generation of Apple's, and was blown away by comparison. However, PC's were ungodly expensive back then, and I could get 2 green-screen 8088 PC's for the price of one Apple. As nice to look at and more powerful? Nope....but cheaper. Having to outfit 100 people in an office environment, and taking that price tag from $30k to $15k was hard to argue with.

Apple would have easily killed MS in those days, if they had the brains to license their hardware, and drive the cost down. Heck, you had to buy a new video card WITH a new monitor...couldn't upgrade just one, in a lot of cases. If they licensed the hardware, you'd have had Apple in the drivers seat, with MS the distant second. Perfect example of closed-source/proprietary losing.
 
Old 10-27-2016, 06:29 PM   #33
frankbell
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu MATE, Mageia, and whatever VMs I happen to be playing with
Posts: 19,310
Blog Entries: 28

Rep: Reputation: 6136Reputation: 6136Reputation: 6136Reputation: 6136Reputation: 6136Reputation: 6136Reputation: 6136Reputation: 6136Reputation: 6136Reputation: 6136Reputation: 6136
Quote:
.....If it wasn't for MS you probably would not have all this cheaply available x86 hardware to install your OS on...
The most recent Linux Voice podcast addressed this. They pointed out that Microsoft's notion of an OS that could run on many different hardware platforms was innovative in its day, that, up till then, OS's were tightly tied to the hardware. (That may have been the only thing MS ever innovated.) Here's the link to the podcast: https://www.linuxvoice.com/podcast-season-4-episode-15/

Do listen--it's the rare tech podcast that is actually fun and full of laughter.
 
Old 10-28-2016, 10:40 AM   #34
cynwulf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,727

Rep: Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwizardone View Post
Could be, but I've always thought it had more to do with IBM deciding to use readily available third market parts to build their first two or three generations of personal computers.
Yes IBM had a part in it and contracting MS to 'produce' the OS was quite arguably what led to the current situation.

One could also argue that, as a result, you still have cheap OEM x86 hardware today... you only need to hose the crap that's installed on it and install one (or more) of a plethora of very decent and free operating systems which are available...

In the end "affordable computing for the masses" had to materialise in some form or other with the "internet revolution", but one could say that MS kick started or accelerated this and helped provide the platform and raison de'etre for projects such as 386BSD and Linux.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
which linux Operating systems applied to Embedded systems? ubun2os Linux - Embedded & Single-board computer 3 03-14-2013 04:24 PM
LXer: Isolating Your Linux Systems - How Sharing Operating Systems Can Put Holes in Your PCI Complia LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-09-2011 04:10 AM
LXer: Operating Systems and Market Share Statistics LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 03-10-2010 09:41 AM
LXer: Linux, Microsoft and Sun to discuss the future of operating systems, but where' LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 03-11-2009 09:10 PM
LXer: Microsoft: Don't sell PCs without operating systems LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-06-2006 01:21 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:20 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration