11-02-2010, 09:02 AM
|
#32
|
LQ Guru
Registered: May 2005
Location: Atlanta Georgia USA
Distribution: Redhat (RHEL), CentOS, Fedora, CoreOS, Debian, FreeBSD, HP-UX, Solaris, SCO
Posts: 7,831
|
Right Unspawn.
Fedora is designed to be bleeding edge and on their site they tell you not to use it for Production environments. Things that end up in RHEL usually don't unless they've first been tested in Fedora. That doesn't make it unstable - it makes it what it is designed to be.
CentOS on the other hand is a build from the RHEL source RPMs and therefore is as stable as the RHEL on which it is based.
I've seen far more "emergency" issues require people to scramble to fix their Debian systems than I have for RHEL/CentOS in the past few years.
|
|
|