Visit the LQ Articles and Editorials section
Go Back > Forums > > LQ Suggestions & Feedback
User Name
LQ Suggestions & Feedback Do you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.


  Search this Thread
Old 04-23-2013, 03:02 PM   #31
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 11,741

Rep: Reputation: 2967Reputation: 2967Reputation: 2967Reputation: 2967Reputation: 2967Reputation: 2967Reputation: 2967Reputation: 2967Reputation: 2967Reputation: 2967Reputation: 2967

As I've said in the past, adding to threads of any age is fine as long as your reply is still topical and relevant. We have no plans to block, archive, close or delete threads at any time. Threads older than 6 months have the quick reply box disabled and have a large red warning indicating their age when you reply. Thanks for the feedback.

Old 04-23-2013, 03:04 PM   #32
Randicus Draco Albus
Senior Member
Registered: May 2011
Location: Hiding somewhere on planet Earth.
Distribution: OpenBSD
Posts: 1,639
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 568Reputation: 568Reputation: 568Reputation: 568Reputation: 568Reputation: 568
There are two problems with your line of reasoning:
First; you want the board's administrators to protect people from themselves when searching for information. Whether searching the internet or books in a library, critical thinking is required. Fact of life is most of the "stuff" on the internet is misinformation (wrong, inaccurate, and a few lies), with good information being the exception. Sifting through the information (and misinformation) available is the responsibility of the searcher. Unlike Windows, using Linux requires a little thinking. It is not Jeremy's, the moderators', my or your responsibility to do other peoples' thinking for them. And this board is also only one of many boards. A reasonably intelligent person will draw a conclusion after checking more than one source. Blindly accepting the first thing one finds is a problem with that person's search skills (or more bluntly, that person's thinking), not a problem with the board.

Second; a computer users' forum is not a news magazine or instruction manual created by a company for its products. It is also not a help centre staffed by paid professionals. It is a place where computer users support each other by providing solutions to each others' problems. As a resource for people using a computer system that requires at least a minimal level of self-reliance, a forum is a collection of accumulated information that evolves over time as software changes. Which leads back to critical thinking. Anyone who blindly accepts ten-year-old software advice on a users' forum either needs to learn how to search for information or stop trying to manage a computer system.
Old 04-23-2013, 09:52 PM   #33
LQ Guru
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,448

Rep: Reputation: 1932Reputation: 1932Reputation: 1932Reputation: 1932Reputation: 1932Reputation: 1932Reputation: 1932Reputation: 1932Reputation: 1932Reputation: 1932Reputation: 1932
Any user of a forum needs to look at dates on the posts. Things just change over time. A post from 2000 may still be OK to add to. Just depends on the issue. 14 years is a long time for this type of data. In fact, 3 or 4 years is about the limit on useful data.

I'm not sure adding to most older posts improves the overall effectiveness. I find it takes more thought. One then needs to consider the entire scope of the original issue based on all one knows or remembers from that time and then asks themselves if the fix is correct.


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How do I unsubscribe from ancient threads ? H_TeXMeX_H LQ Suggestions & Feedback 6 06-02-2011 07:58 PM
some threads are become unnoticed because of large number of continious threads deepak_cucek LQ Suggestions & Feedback 9 08-20-2009 11:21 PM
problems with synchronization of threads in updating a text buffer in gtk2.0 stephenwalter Programming 2 12-29-2005 11:31 PM
Java threads listed using kill -3 does not contain all threads found using ps -auxww coneheed Programming 2 11-14-2005 08:57 AM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:01 AM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration