LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
I think that in addition to a fuller description of the issue, a comparison would be a good idea. So, "LQ is so cluttered. Compare LQ with www.example.com and see how the site should be written." We can then discuss your complaint in a more directed fashion.
Originally posted by kencaz Don't change a thing!!!
I agree! This site is a lot easier to look at then say, justlinux. It's simple, which makes the loading time faster, hardly any ads (and those have to be there to keep the site running). All in all a really cool site, with everything you need, and what it does not have can be mentioned in Website Suggestions & Feedback.
No Unhappiness here.
perhaps it is the hardware of our unfortunate member? I seem to remember LQ looked cruddy- but on my current box it is fine. The colours are muted - nice on the eyes. There is a lot of untrapped whitespace- (if you are into publishing, you know what I mean, elsewise, nevermind) the spaceing is nice.
Though I don't have any complaints, please don't feel like we are telling you to shut up. If there is a definite problem, jeremy et al need to know about it.
I am somewhat sick and tired of these kinds of posts. I once had my forum reviewed on another board and I blew my top when somebody totally trashed my hard work and wrote quite unpleasant things about it.
These kinds of posts evoke very negative reactions and for good reason.
The the OP: be very careful when doing this on other forums. You might just get flamed from pillar to post.
"Ugliness and clutter" doesn't mean a thing unless it is substantiated by some concrete positive suggestions. By not doing that, you are earning the ire of other people who visit this forum.
Believe me it does hurt somebody like me to see people criticize for the sake of criticism. Being a site owner myself, I know how tough it is to take it lying down when people post negative criticism of all your hard work without posting any concrete suggestions.
Last edited by vharishankar; 07-21-2005 at 09:29 PM.