LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > LQ Suggestions & Feedback
User Name
Password
LQ Suggestions & Feedback Do you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 03-28-2005, 01:22 AM   #1
t3gah
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Distribution: SuSE, RedHat, ubuntu, Debian
Posts: 734

Rep: Reputation: 30
Lightbulb Threads that are locked and have no replies should be unlocked and replied to


... and then locked again or maybe they should be deleted instead....

Here are three examples that I found on the last pages of the Zero Reply Thread link:

http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...=&threadid=206
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...=&threadid=204
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...=&threadid=203

(Ever little bit helps reduce the number of "no replies" from the list so as we the ones answering the questions don't always have to see the same locked/unanswered threads on the list year after year after year.)
 
Old 03-28-2005, 02:53 AM   #2
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,384

Rep: Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963
this is not a scalable solution, and presents no benefit to anyone at all. what good is the manual removal of three posts? The idea is to reply with useful content to improve the quality of the site, not to just fudge statistics.
 
Old 03-28-2005, 06:38 AM   #3
trickykid
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,133

Rep: Reputation: 197Reputation: 197
This has got to tbe the dumbest idea ever.. sorry.. no pun intended!

These threads were probably locked for a reason and the user emailed being explained why they were locked. No action to me is required to get these off the 0 replied searches.
 
Old 03-28-2005, 06:41 AM   #4
ror
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 583

Rep: Reputation: 33
otoh, if the "zero replies" search could be improved to filter out locked threads that would be useful.
 
Old 03-28-2005, 06:46 AM   #5
trickykid
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,133

Rep: Reputation: 197Reputation: 197
Quote:
Originally posted by ror
otoh, if the "zero replies" search could be improved to filter out locked threads that would be useful.
True but otoh, when doing a search, the icons off to the left of the threads listed should show if they are locked or not.. and with the small number of threads that have 0 replies and are locked, I see the work involved overwhelming compared to those who can easily skip past the few that are in such situations.
 
Old 03-28-2005, 07:15 AM   #6
ror
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 583

Rep: Reputation: 33
overwhelming?? there's no work in specifying an extra search parameter if one exists.
 
Old 03-28-2005, 07:20 AM   #7
trickykid
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,133

Rep: Reputation: 197Reputation: 197
Quote:
Originally posted by ror
overwhelming?? there's no work in specifying an extra search parameter if one exists.
I expressed this as overwhelming since the impact it would do is rid of a just a few threads that are easily bypassable if the searcher actually takes notice of the icons we use on this site.

I'd also gaurantee that almost all of these threads that were locked are from 2 years or longer ago, since now we have a rule in place to publicly state why a thread was closed.

Even if it takes Jeremy 2 seconds to implement.. I still see that as wasted time in this scenario.
 
Old 03-28-2005, 07:45 AM   #8
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 10,356

Rep: Reputation: 2616Reputation: 2616Reputation: 2616Reputation: 2616Reputation: 2616Reputation: 2616Reputation: 2616Reputation: 2616Reputation: 2616Reputation: 2616Reputation: 2616
t3gah, you seem to be slightly misinterpreting the point of the 0 reply drive. Digging up 5 year old threads just to get them off the list is not in the spirit of what we are trying too accomplish. We are trying to minimize the list with a ficus on attempting to ensure that no new threads get added. If you have something useful or pertinent to add to an old thread, by all means do - but just posting to get a thread off the 0 reply list should never be done. Thanks.

--jeremy
 
Old 04-07-2005, 06:18 PM   #9
matix
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: Tasmania AU
Distribution: Debian Sarge - is stable wooo!
Posts: 21

Rep: Reputation: 15
and on the zero reply list

is it ok for me to potter through the announcements you've made for oh lets say the debian potato release or php releases or mysql?

is there any way that release announcements could be excluded, or auto excluded after a set time so they dont show up?

edit:
in fact could/should the website suggestions forum be excluded from the zero replies list?

i am fairly new here to please take pity if its a stupid idea

Last edited by matix; 04-07-2005 at 06:20 PM.
 
Old 04-08-2005, 06:58 AM   #10
vharishankar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,142
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 121Reputation: 121
Quote:
is it ok for me to potter through the announcements you've made for oh lets say the debian potato release or php releases or mysql?
No. You're missing the point. The drive to get rid of 0 posts threads is not to reply to old threads. It is to answer the new questions more effectively and help improve LQ.org as a community. Very old threads are better left well alone. Just ignore very old threads or threads that are just announcements (unless you really want to reply of course).
 
Old 04-13-2005, 07:45 AM   #11
t3gah
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Distribution: SuSE, RedHat, ubuntu, Debian
Posts: 734

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
If those that are locked with no reply and they reside in the Zero Thread eventually when the thread goes down because we've answered all of the questions to date, except those that we can't because they are locked, LQ.org will have page after page of locked, dead threads in the 0 Reply Thread link. The link of course can't be renamed when we get down to them because there will always be more new unreplied threads. It would of course be nice and a boost to morale if the pages listed now, 1067, dropped down to the obviously lower count because it would be without the locked/unreplied threads because they got moved to a new thread area of maybe "dead threads" that we forum users can not see.

Which is also why I made he comment about the posts by Jeremy. What a boost to peoples, those trying to make that gargantuan list go down would be morale wise if his possible 1,000 posts about new news, updates and apologies from a "Server down" situation of LQ.org that you, Jeremy might have made since the year 2000 that would simply "disappear" from the "zero thread".

I of course have no idea if there are 1,000 or less or more because all I go by is what I see when I click from the "Last page" of the "Zero reply thread" and work my way forward.

When we get down to the "end" It won't be a pretty sight but I'm sure it will be memorable seeing all those pages of locked unanswered threads or page after page of posts by jeremy.
 
Old 04-13-2005, 07:51 AM   #12
trickykid
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,133

Rep: Reputation: 197Reputation: 197
May I ask that you stop reporting closed posts from 3 and 4 years ago cause they didn't have replies when closed. We are not going to reply to a closed thread that old just to get it off the 0 replies list, well, especially since its harmless and no point in replying to it if its going to stay closed, most likely cause the original poster double/triple/quadruple posted it.. in some cases if you see a thread that was closed without a reply, it usually means the member was contacted via email.

So stop reporting such posts.. please, your only wasting our time and your own.
 
Old 04-13-2005, 05:42 PM   #13
t3gah
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Distribution: SuSE, RedHat, ubuntu, Debian
Posts: 734

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by trickykid
May I ask that you stop reporting closed posts from 3 and 4 years ago cause they didn't have replies when closed. We are not going to reply to a closed thread that old just to get it off the 0 replies list, well, especially since its harmless and no point in replying to it if its going to stay closed, most likely cause the original poster double/triple/quadruple posted it.. in some cases if you see a thread that was closed without a reply, it usually means the member was contacted via email.

So stop reporting such posts.. please, your only wasting our time and your own.
Ok, I gotcha. Ignore the post from jeremy on the front page of LQ.org
 
Old 04-13-2005, 08:32 PM   #14
trickykid
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,133

Rep: Reputation: 197Reputation: 197
Quote:
Originally posted by t3gah
Ok, I gotcha. Ignore the post from jeremy on the front page of LQ.org
Your still not getting the point of the message.. cutting down on the number of posts without replies is a good thing, replying to 4 year old threads and threads that were closed for a particular reason without a reply is not the goal of cutting down 0 replied posts. Think of it this way, focus on the present, not the past. We're not on a mission to meet any type of quota, so some of the posts that have 0 replies are out of scope.. focus your attention to newer posts or more recent posts, not the one's your obsessed over from years ago..
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Java threads listed using kill -3 does not contain all threads found using ps -auxww coneheed Programming 2 11-14-2005 08:57 AM
xlock easily unlocked? Mr. Eek Linux - Software 2 02-24-2005 11:40 AM
Locked threads Craigwd LQ Suggestions & Feedback 6 08-22-2004 09:25 PM
Java Threads vs Native Threads rjmendez Programming 0 08-16-2004 05:58 AM
Threads without replies GAVollink LQ Suggestions & Feedback 5 08-16-2002 05:14 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:56 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration