LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux - Distributions > Linspire > Linspire 5-0 headache
Have you noticed editing is always needed for the inevitable typos that weren't there when you hit the "post" button?
THE BOTTOM LINE ::
Yes I certainly have noticed this, and, no I don't blame the systems. I done it. Argh. I do proof-read everything. It still happens. ARGH. Hmm...? ... !!!! ::
Given that I default to use small fonts on my 17-inch at 1280x1024, to allow me to see enough at one time to be able to *think* instead of spending my entire day scrolling around & losing my -very- complex thoughts, *AND* that the quite small reply-box uses small, -proportional-, *thin* fonts, thus I can't see every single letter that well, and I AM NOT going to change my needed reso just for one or two // *ANY* website.
Bottom line is I suspect *many* users have this problem for one reason or another.
I have a suggestion or two, please...
A larger box would help in proof-reading, and might encourage some of us to _not_ try to format, or feeling like we --need-- to format, to the size of the box.
A fixed font would definitely help proofing. Also would benefit from larger box.
Could also add a reminder to proof-read before hitting 'submit'; would probably be better-obeyed with larger box.
Could also make box taller to help. *Could* also call for one size larger.
Could *possibly* use a cookie or somthing to allow user-settings, maybe including automatic spell-check when 'submit'.
Yeah, yeah, I know, but most of us are kinda busy, no? It's called 'human nature,' and you mostly lose...
THE BOTTOM LINE FOR LQ.O ::
would probably reduce server loading somewhat, be reducing fetches & puts for edits done due to typo's. Might also reduce admin/moderator time since there would be a little less to scroll through, too.
Just a couple of thoughts, guys.
Whadda ya's t'ink?
Robert G. Hays.
Last edited by Robert G. Hays; 03-22-2005 at 06:04 PM.
No offense intended but I'm having trouble understanding what your suggestion is, due to the format of your post and the numerous sentence fragments. Are you quoting an existing post, or is this a snippet of conversation, or is it a mix of both of them?
From what I gather, it seems you are suggesting to make the spell check button larger, and perhaps to also automatically include the spell check function as part of the posting process. Is that correct, and if not, can you clarify your points? -- J.W.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Is the consensus that the box is too small? It certainly seems more than wide enough for me in the browsers that I use (Mozilla/FF). The height is admittedly not that tall, but I don't want to eat up *too* much screen space as people already miss many of the useful links that are on the bottom of the page.