Suggestion: add [tt] markup tag
Hi all.
It may just be meing typing \tt and \texttt and too often, but I think LQ lacks a `tt' (teletype) tag. True, there are the code tags, but they really disrupt the text flow. Example: Define your own operator new which counts allocations. versus Define your own Code:
operator new There are other bad solutions:
In short, I see no good alternatives to a [tt] tag when that's what I need, so I propose it be added. Kind regards, Jonas Kölker PS. I would also like to see [em] be added (it shows, doesn't it?). |
purist! i instead of em works well. :)
I tend to use bold for code when telling people what to type ie: ping your IP address (italics show what they should fill in, not type directly) or cd .. and the code tag for long lengths of code. titanium_geek |
Quote:
However, using i and b instead of em and tt seems like a kludgey workaround. I'd rather see things done right\footnote{I'm one of those folks who thinks web markup is only getting worse}. Or have user comments be run through \texttt{latex2html} :D Jonas Kölker. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:15 AM. |