LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
The're all in 163DATA.COM.CN and CNDATA.COM, basically 222.186.24.0/24, 60.169.73.0/24, 117.41.185.0/24 and 122.226.223.0/24 and all account names are easily recognizable as they all have a seemingly-R/L-like {firstname}{surname} handle.
I was actually thinking of starting a thread on this in LQ S&F, as I had noticed a bunch of profiles "crawling" LQ /General which all had zero posts and the same birth date (Nov 30). I decided against it because I figured that maybe my sample size wasn't big enough and it could have just been a coincidence. :-\
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 9,110
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien Bob
That's not good... the site is vulnerable to spammers. Is the registration process too easy to automate?
We have quite a few ant-spam measures in place and effectively block thousands of spam messages a day. This recent attack has been cleaned up and is something completely new from what I can tell. We're looking into how to prevent it moving forward now.
The're all in 163DATA.COM.CN and CNDATA.COM, basically 222.186.24.0/24, 60.169.73.0/24, 117.41.185.0/24 and 122.226.223.0/24 and all account names are easily recognizable as they all have a seemingly-R/L-like {firstname}{surname} handle.
Really? The spammer (and I'm sure it's one person) didn't bother to have each bot register from a different proxy? I'm shocked.
Also, since most of the spam posts had the same post bodies, programming the forum software to reject those specific strings would have worked temporarily.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 9,110
Rep:
Just a quick note that we've cleaned things up. This was a new type of attack that our current spam filters (which catch an absolutely huge amount of spam) missed. I'd like to thank the mod team for their diligence and the members for their patience during this attack. Moving forward I think we have this one sorted out, but if you notice anything else odd, please let me know. Also, I do have one request. While we *really* appreciate the reported posts, if members could refrain from actually posting in the threads themselves (be it about the spam or responding to the spammer), we'd really appreciate it. While we have automated ways to remove the posts from the spammers, there's no way for us to automatically remove posts from legitimate members about the spam. Thanks again.
Glad that it's sorted out now. One question: is it better to just report a single post from a spammer, rather than every one? I started doing the former when I realised there was a large scale attack, so as not to fill up people's inboxes.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.