[SOLVED] Search terms with logical "and" possible?
LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
If you go to the advanced search and enter rsync AND 5888 in the search box and change Show Results as to Posts, you'll get the behavior you desire (although unfortunately, this thread is the only result).
Distribution: openSuSE 42.1_64-KDE, Ubuntu 14.04, Mint 17.2
Originally Posted by jeremy
although unfortunately, this thread is the only result
D@rn, that's what I was afraid of. Would you believe it, the earliest google entries are more than ten years old, but none explain the meaning of the error code to this very day. "May have sonething to do with permissions" is the maximum of expressed opinions, grrrr .
Anyhow, thanks for explainig the boolean syntax of this site. Perhaps the addition of a little hint on the advanced search page might be a nice touch... .