LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > LQ Suggestions & Feedback
User Name
Password
LQ Suggestions & Feedback Do you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 12-14-2010, 07:37 AM   #1
jlinkels
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Bonaire
Distribution: Debian Wheezy/Jessie/Sid, Linux Mint DE
Posts: 4,236

Rep: Reputation: 545Reputation: 545Reputation: 545Reputation: 545Reputation: 545Reputation: 545
Reply notification of message posted 6 years ago?


Today I received this e-mail. I have included the complete headers for clarity, never mind the 'xxx', I put them in myself for obfuscation. The announcement is for a post made 6 years ago.

Code:
Return-Path: <forum@linuxquestions.org>
 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4-_caribisles_ (2008-01-01) on
********water.carixxxles.net
 X-Spam-Level: 
 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
********DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,FH_DATE_PAST_20XX,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no
********version=3.2.4-_caribisles_
 Received: from mail.carixxxles.net [204.10.0.246]
********by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.5)
********for jlinkels@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:31:17 -0400 (GMT+4)
 Received: from mxb.protectmyemail.net (mxb.protectmyemail.net [204.10.1.19])
********by water.carixxxles.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id oBE3TNZF015828
********for <jlinkels@xxx.an>; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:29:24 -0400
 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1292297362-2074f4140001-shsCsn
 Received: from sql02.linuxquestions.org (smtp.linuxquestions.org [208.101.3.244]) by mxb.protectmyemail.net with ESMTP id KKHWVQlY80rX5vi1 for <jlinkels@xxx.an>; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 22:29:22 -0500 (EST)
 X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: forum@linuxquestions.org
 X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 208.101.3.244
 Received: from web01.linuxquestions.org (web01-be.linuxquestions.org [10.13.156.2])
********by sql02.linuxquestions.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oBE3TMjI008022
********for <jlinkels@xxx.an>; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 22:29:22 -0500
 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=smtp; d=linuxquestions.org; c=simple; q=dns;
********b=hS61/NxEheeuqknGhcxHnLmbaemnhr3EcpWYrmd+tobhPcUUAunWSAQbToxJopVta
********ttSLcltaVrZ7OYTG5G4IA==
 Received: from web01.linuxquestions.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
********by web01.linuxquestions.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oBE3TMu0004202
********for <jlinkels@xxx.an>; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 22:29:22 -0500
 Received: (from nobody@localhost)
********by web01.linuxquestions.org (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id oBE3TL3T004201;
********Mon, 13 Dec 2010 22:29:21 -0500
 Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 22:29:21 -0500
 To: jlinkels@rnw.an
 Subject: Reply to thread 'IPTABLES rules for active FTP'
 From: "LinuxQuestions.org" <forum@linuxquestions.org>
 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Reply to thread 'IPTABLES rules for active FTP'
 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
 Message-ID: <20101214032921.fd162dc52215@www.linuxquestions.org>
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
 X-Priority: 3
 X-Mailer: LQ Mailer
 X-Barracuda-Connect: smtp.linuxquestions.org[208.101.3.244]
 X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1292297362
 X-Barracuda-URL: http://www.protectmyemail.net:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi
 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on water.caribisles.net
 X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at protectmyemail.net
 X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00
 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=5.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=3.5 KILL_LEVEL=7.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED
 X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.49365
********Rule breakdown below
******** pts rule name * * * * * * *description
********---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
********0.00 DKIM_SIGNED * * * * * *Domain Keys Identified Mail: message has a signature
 X-Virus-Status: Clean
 X-UIDL: o-3"!7W`"!Bj\!!M,g!!
 X-Length: 4209
 X-UID: 3425
 
Dear jlinkels,

TruckStuff has just replied to a thread you have subscribed to entitled - IPTABLES rules for active FTP - in the Linux - Security forum of LinuxQuestions.org.

This thread is located at:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?t=22127&goto=newpost

Here is the message that has just been posted:
***************

---Quote---
Originally posted by heby 
*just look at them:

iptables -A OUTPUT -o eth0 -p tcp --sport ftp -j ACCEPT
iptables -A OUTPUT -o eth0 -
***************


There may also be other replies, but you will not receive any more notifications until you visit the forum again.

All the best,
LinuxQuestions.org
jlinkels
 
Old 12-14-2010, 09:49 AM   #2
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 10,623

Rep: Reputation: 2657Reputation: 2657Reputation: 2657Reputation: 2657Reputation: 2657Reputation: 2657Reputation: 2657Reputation: 2657Reputation: 2657Reputation: 2657Reputation: 2657
jlinkels,

There were indeed posts made to the thread yesterday.

--jeremy
 
Old 12-14-2010, 10:49 AM   #3
jlinkels
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Bonaire
Distribution: Debian Wheezy/Jessie/Sid, Linux Mint DE
Posts: 4,236

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 545Reputation: 545Reputation: 545Reputation: 545Reputation: 545Reputation: 545
Jeremy,

Can't imagine that, the last message is from 2009-04-22 and the thread is closed. I can't image moderators remove the last posted message when closing a thread.

Besides, this e-mail quotes exactly the post made by Truckstuff in 2006.

jlinkels
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-14-2010, 10:53 AM   #4
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 10,623

Rep: Reputation: 2657Reputation: 2657Reputation: 2657Reputation: 2657Reputation: 2657Reputation: 2657Reputation: 2657Reputation: 2657Reputation: 2657Reputation: 2657Reputation: 2657
I see what happened. Thanks for the heads up.

--jeremy
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-14-2010, 10:33 PM   #5
win32sux
Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,870

Rep: Reputation: 371Reputation: 371Reputation: 371Reputation: 371
I got one of these too (and I'm the one who had closed that thread). I made a mental note to ask Jeremy about this weirdness, but my memory sucks and I forgot. It sounds like the issue has been identified, though. Thanks to jeremy for looking into this and jlinkels for reporting.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Used Linux years ago, interested again... bobbo LinuxQuestions.org Member Intro 1 11-28-2010 11:13 PM
a couple of years ago i bought rh 5.2 and then emigrated fgh Red Hat 8 08-22-2008 07:58 PM
Perhaps Stallman had broken TC 10 years ago hamtavs General 5 02-05-2007 04:37 PM
Dial-up on RH9: worked two years ago alar Linux - Networking 2 04-30-2005 06:01 PM
Posted this a while ago... Grim Reaper Linux - Software 4 08-27-2004 11:09 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:30 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration