Please put the average connection speed/bandwidth of mirrors on LQ
LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
The % rating is not always reliable. In different places in the world, people may have different types of internet connection. What is good for them is not always good for others. Also location is a very important factor.
The better method would be to specify the hosting server's total and available bandwidth/speed (i.e. the connection that the server that hosts the image to connect to the internet).
The reason I say it is this:
The other day, I downloaded SuSE Live 9.2 from a mirror which was highly rated and I got a very slow connection and the download took about 36 hours continuously on my slow cable connection. At the end of it, my download was corrupted probably due to long duration of inactivity with the download.
Yesterday I downloaded Knoppix 3.6 from another mirror and I good a consistently good speed of download and it took only 21 hours. And the downloaded file was good and uncorrupted.
So to me, the difference between a good connection and a bad connection is about 15 hours of wasted time and also a possible corrupted ISO image.
It would be nice if this info is available, however I agree that it may not always be accurate.
OK. If there are any other options to better representing a mirror's reliability/bandwidth, it would be nice.
However, being in India, I must say that in general, I find the Japanese/Singapore/Australasian/Pacific mirrors much faster and offer more consistent connections for my needs than mirrors in Europe or the US.