[SOLVED] Number of characters permitted in a thread title
LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Speaking of which, the "through the cp command" part of the above is really the wrong way go about asking the question anyway. Unless you have some very specific reason for using that one command, it's generally better to simply state what you want to accomplish, and leave the how part of it to the discussion itself. Quite often the best solution will have nothing to do with the method the OP thinks should be used.
I mentioned the cp command because I find cp command easier to use.
Had I not mentioned it, I would have got other people wasting their time telling me how to do it through sed or awk which I never want, as I do not understand those languages.
Last of all HAPPY BIRTHDAY
Last edited by Aquarius_Girl; 07-02-2010 at 08:04 AM.
I've written a reply to your thread that you linked to, explaining why the command you tried went wrong. There, you can say what you really wanted to do.
I've written a reply to your thread that you linked to, explaining why the command you tried went wrong. There, you can say what you really wanted to do.
Yes i know and i'll thank you there when i read all the replies.
I mentioned the cp command because I find cp command easier to use.
Had I not mentioned it, I would have got other people wasting their time telling me how to do it through sed or awk which I never want, as I do not understand those languages.
Last of all HAPPY BIRTHDAY
First of all, thank you.
But it doesn't matter if you're more familiar with one tool, if in fact it's the wrong one to use.
Most questions focus on accomplishing a specific goal, and the asker should be open to all suggestions for accomplishing that goal. You're always free to take or leave anything you're told, of course. And there's nothing preventing you from mentioning the fact that you'd prefer to use tool X in the post itself. Just be aware that, even if the repliers take that preference into account, they're still going to tell you the best ways they know for doing what you want, whether it includes tool X or not.
"I don't understand X" seems to me to be a weak excuse anyway. It's precisely through situations like this that you'll start learning how X works. I can't begin to tell you how much I've learned simply by reading the discussions here. How can learning something new be a bad thing?
Finally, don't forget that this is an open forum and the threads remain around for everyone long after you're finished with them. So even if you aren't personally interested in some specific piece of advice, another reader with a similar problem years later may stumble upon it and find it to be exactly what he needed.
Last edited by David the H.; 07-02-2010 at 08:42 AM.
First of all, thank you.
Most questions focus on accomplishing a specific goal, and the asker should be open to all suggestions for accomplishing that goal. You're always free to take or leave anything you're told, of course. And there's nothing preventing you from mentioning the fact that you'd prefer to use tool X in the post itself. Just be aware that, even if the repliers take that preference into account, they're still going to tell you the best ways they know for doing what you want, whether it includes tool X or not.
I do not have any issues with the other posters posting the methods they prefer of doing a job, I just do not want to waste their precious time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by David the H.
"I don't understand X" seems to me to be a weak excuse anyway. It's precisely through situations like this that you'll start learning how X works. I can't begin to tell you how much I've learned simply by reading the discussions here. How can learning something new be a bad thing?
I do not have the NEED to learn sed , awk, perl at this moment of time. I do not want to be like jack of all and master of none type.
Thanks for bothering.
LETS NOT DERAIL THE THREAD NOW.
MY PROBLEM WAS : I WANTED A LITTLE MORE SPACE TO COMPLETE THE DESCRIPTIVE TITLE I HAD CHOSEN FOR MY THREAD.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.