LinuxQuestions.org
LinuxAnswers - the LQ Linux tutorial section.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > LQ Suggestions & Feedback
User Name
Password
LQ Suggestions & Feedback Do you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.

Notices

Tags used in this thread
Popular LQ Tags

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-12-2006, 02:43 PM   #1
mighlani
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Posts: 5
Thanked: 0
Not allowing Urls for newbies


[Log in to get rid of this advertisement]
Hi -

I wanted to post a serious question about a linux problem that I am experiencing. There are no domains i am advertising or anything like that.

How can I post my question ?

Thanks and regards
mighlani
mighlani is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2006, 02:47 PM   #2
Nylex
HCL Maintainer
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,783
Thanked: 40
If you need to post a link, then you can use something like "www dot something dot com/page dot htm". There are perhaps other ways, too (be creative?). If you can though, try and help people, thus increasing your post count and letting you post links .
Nylex is offline     Reply With Quote


Old 04-12-2006, 02:53 PM   #3
mighlani
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Posts: 5
Thanked: 0

Original Poster
Thanks .. but I needed to show a snapshot of a log file. I guess I'll simply have to wait till my count goes up. Quite odd for an online forum though.
mighlani is offline     Reply With Quote


Old 04-12-2006, 02:57 PM   #4
Nylex
HCL Maintainer
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,783
Thanked: 40
It's there to prevent spam. Can you not just post the contents of the file?
Nylex is offline     Reply With Quote


Old 04-12-2006, 03:02 PM   #5
mighlani
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Posts: 5
Thanked: 0

Original Poster
Thats what I tried. Its a maillog regarding sendmail. So it will undoubtedly have email addresses. I even tried putting something generic but no joy.

But I do understand your point about spam. Its the age old thing. Few culprits spoil the fun for community.
mighlani is offline     Reply With Quote


Old 04-12-2006, 10:09 PM   #6
J.W.
Moderator
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Distribution: Slack v12, SuSE v11.1, Mint v7
Posts: 6,620
Thanked: 5
The "minimum post rule" for URL's is indeed intended to block spam. As you might guess, the site admin needed to determine a reasonable compromise between preventing spammers from flooding the forums with advertisments, but also to avoid creating obstacles for legitimate users from posting links.
J.W. is offline     Reply With Quote


Old 04-14-2006, 01:47 AM   #7
titanium_geek
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2002
Location: Melbourne Australia
Distribution: it died/ macosx
Posts: 2,382
Thanked: 4
The idea is that bots sign up and post once- then move on. So after 5 posts in the old days, you could post links. now it's 3 posts, is it not?

titanium_geek
titanium_geek is online now     Reply With Quote


Old 04-14-2006, 02:42 AM   #8
hs123
Registered User
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,832
Blog Entries: 4
Thanked: 9
You can post the url without the http:// and www part. It'll be ok then.
hs123 is offline     Reply With Quote


Old 05-03-2006, 12:58 AM   #9
SirMsquared
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 18
Thanked: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nylex
If you need to post a link, then you can use something like "www dot something dot com/page dot htm". There are perhaps other ways, too (be creative?). If you can though, try and help people, thus increasing your post count and letting you post links .
Or just post without the link, then edit it. For example, my post here:

http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...69#post2227569

But really, that's not the solution. Better ways of determining that a real person is posting is the solution. Something like Captcha would work fine.

Quote:
Originally Posted by titanium_geek
The idea is that bots sign up and post once- then move on. So after 5 posts in the old days, you could post links. now it's 3 posts, is it not?
Sure, but if you use something like Captcha at registration time and at post time, you will confirm that a person performed both operations, and did so with a verified email address. Surely that's too hard for the spammer at the moment?

How about a combination of both approaches: For registration and the first x posts (x could be higher than the current 3 non-URL post limit, since it's less of an inconvenience than not posting URLs) Captcha is required, then afterwards it's not.
SirMsquared is offline  
Tag This Post
Reply With Quote


Old 05-03-2006, 10:23 AM   #10
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 7,142
Thanked: 164
We already use captcha for registration. Two comments: First, I don't think requiring captcha for 100% of new users is more convenient then now allowing URLs for the <5% that need a URL immediately. More importantly, we get a fair amount of hit-and-run *manual* spammers who would happily fill out the captcha. The no URL policy usually means they try a couple times, and move on to an easier target.

--jeremy
jeremy is offline     Reply With Quote


Old 05-03-2006, 11:21 PM   #11
Simon Bridge
Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Red Beach (NZ)
Distribution: Ubuntu 9.04
Posts: 8,185
Blog Entries: 3
Thanked: 97
Top 3 ways of getting to post a URL.

1. Get involved with the community:
... look through the zero-reply threads and help three people before you make your first post. You should be able to find three issues you can at least comment on. As an added bonus you'll establish an early rep as someone worth talking to. The really experienced folk here will give better replies to people they feel are contributing.

2. Tax your English writing skills:
Write the URL in its searchable format ... say: "I found that the open source version of "foo" from "bar.org" worked well, though my mate still preferrs the proprietary version from tanstaafl.com" instead. Thus anyone googling "foo" in connection with either domain should hit the right page in the top five.

3. Hack the parser:
(a) Leave off the entire "http://www." part at the front.
(b) Disable "automatically parse urls" in your profile.
(While you're at it, you could add your distro and location there too ...)

4. Start a Thread (or three) about why this is lame...
You sould be able to get three easy posts out of protesting the policy while the hackers all try to tell you why it isn't Honestly; I'm surprised Jeremy dosn't just respond with a link to the standard reply-set.

Last edited by Simon Bridge; 05-03-2006 at 11:29 PM.. Reason: Jesus had twelve true apostrophes - I cannot seem to get one <sigh>
Simon Bridge is offline     Reply With Quote



Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why newbies cant post urls before 5 posts? Giant of Victoria General 11 03-11-2006 05:55 PM
Urls swordwielder LQ Suggestions & Feedback 3 02-28-2006 01:37 PM
how to check urls and stop internet urls in network gface Linux - Networking 5 03-24-2005 10:48 PM
.urls mikedelo Linux - Newbie 5 03-29-2004 06:32 PM
kde and URLs salparadise Linux - Newbie 1 12-12-2002 07:33 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:23 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
RSS2  LQ Podcast
RSS2  LQ Radio
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration