LQ Suggestions & Feedback Do you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
|
08-30-2004, 02:17 PM
|
#1
|
root 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 9,536
|
LQ Usertitles
Based on feedback we are slightly restructuring the LQ usertitles a bit. Here is the new layout:
# 0 - 29 posts: Newbie
# 30 - 999 posts: Member
# 1000 posts: Senior Member
# After 5000 posts you can choose between Guru and LQ Addict
We have two options now and I'd like your opinion. Should we reset all members who are now between 1000 and 4999 to Senior Members, or should they be grandfathered in as Guru/LQ Addicts?
--jeremy
|
|
|
|
08-30-2004, 02:22 PM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: England
Distribution: Used to use Mandrake/Mandriva
Posts: 2,794
Rep: 
|
Noo! You cant take away my LQ Addict Status option!!!
FYI I'm not using it atm coz I'm celebrating getting 2.6.8.1 working.
Edit: Looking at the top 100 of the memberlist, there arent even many of us above 2000, and it depends what you want Guru to mean. Atm I think all above 4000 are Mods anyway. So maybe 2000+ is Addict/Guru, with current ones carried over. 
Last edited by Proud; 08-30-2004 at 02:31 PM.
|
|
|
|
08-30-2004, 02:37 PM
|
#3
|
|
Guru
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,128
Rep: 
|
I vote to keep all existing users with their current titles as they wish or give them choice of Sr. Member or LQ Addict and all new members who reach these plateau's to be affected. Then at 5k they have the choice of Guru, etc....
|
|
|
|
08-30-2004, 02:50 PM
|
#4
|
|
Moderator
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Lubuntu
Posts: 19,088
|
Nice - I agree. All existing to be offered the choice and so on. Hopefully that'll mean that anyone who cares about titles is catered for. 
|
|
|
|
08-30-2004, 06:51 PM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: hopefully not here
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 2,038
Rep:
|
thanks, reset mine  , i think i quite like this new title
thanks again for the new titles jeremy
|
|
|
|
08-30-2004, 07:06 PM
|
#6
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: High Green
Distribution: Fedora Core 4
Posts: 180
Rep:
|
A true daoist hacker would want to always retain the newbie title.
Simon
|
|
|
|
08-30-2004, 07:19 PM
|
#7
|
root 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 9,536
Original Poster
|
As it stands now, if you selected a usertitle it should remain intact. If you never touched it, it's now Senior Member. Moving forward, the rules will apply as in my first post. So far, this seems to be acceptable to everyone. If you would prefer something else, feel free to post here or contact me. Thanks.
-jeremy
|
|
|
|
08-30-2004, 07:30 PM
|
#8
|
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Phuket, Thailand
Distribution: Slackware 13, OS X
Posts: 434
Rep: 
|
JMHO, but I'd prefer no user titles at all.
I have seen too many boards with endless posts of "LOL" or "LMAO" just to increase post-counts and I find it rather meaningless; I mean Torvalds himself would have to make 30 posts to get past "Newbie" status on a Linux discussion board
I like the "Registered xxxx" line though because it gives a sense of continuity or history to a site.
Again JMH(umble)O, no offense all
Mark
|
|
|
|
08-30-2004, 08:17 PM
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Calif, USA
Distribution: Linux Mint 12
Posts: 2,838
Rep:
|
I'd also like to be reset to the Senior Member usertitle.
|
|
|
|
08-30-2004, 08:21 PM
|
#10
|
root 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 9,536
Original Poster
|
chefmark, at this point I don't think it would be fair to just wholesale remove usertitles. Luckily we don't have too many users posting just for titles though
2damncommon, done.
--jeremy
|
|
|
|
09-01-2004, 07:39 AM
|
#11
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: England
Distribution: Used to use Mandrake/Mandriva
Posts: 2,794
Rep: 
|
I still think that 5000 limit is a bit high, it's pointless atm and for a long while yet.
|
|
|
|
09-01-2004, 07:41 AM
|
#12
|
|
Guru
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,128
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Proud
I still think that 5000 limit is a bit high, it's pointless atm and for a long while yet.
|
That's exactly how we thought about 1k posts.. at one time we never thought anyone would reach that on a personal level.. now look.. 
|
|
|
|
09-01-2004, 08:02 AM
|
#13
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: England
Distribution: Used to use Mandrake/Mandriva
Posts: 2,794
Rep: 
|
But check out my top 100 link, that nearly lists all over 1000 posts, and that's the top 1/1316th of the members. Only 27 members top the 2000 posts marker. Just how exclusive do you want the highest title to be? 
|
|
|
|
09-01-2004, 10:34 AM
|
#14
|
|
Guru
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,128
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Proud
But check out my top 100 link, that nearly lists all over 1000 posts, and that's the top 1/1316th of the members. Only 27 members top the 2000 posts marker. Just how exclusive do you want the highest title to be?
|
Were just adjusting to growth, that's how I look at it. :P
|
|
|
|
09-01-2004, 10:36 AM
|
#15
|
|
Guru
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,128
Rep: 
|
And regarding the 27 that have more than 2k posts, that's alot. For anyone who doesn't know, we now have 113 members with more than 1k posts each, with many closing in on that number as well. I think that is one of the main reasons for making this change, it is not going to get too common for those reaching 1k posts if consistent in a very quick time frame.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:13 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|