LinuxQuestions.org
Did you know LQ has a Linux Hardware Compatibility List?
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > LQ Suggestions & Feedback
User Name
Password
LQ Suggestions & Feedback Do you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 04-04-2014, 01:21 AM   #1
AnanthaP
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Chennai, India
Distribution: UBUNTU 5.10 since Jul-18,2006 on Intel 820 DC
Posts: 658

Rep: Reputation: 160Reputation: 160
LQ name change ..


Though I understand why a person might want to change their LQ name, I wonder whether
(a) LQ should change it retrospectively in all earlier threads including those started by the change requestor (current practice).
or
(b) LQ should ask the requestor to exercise a one-time option to change all old threads?
or
(c) Keep the old name for old threads.

I for one would prefer option "c" since once it is posted on LQ, it becomes public.

OK
 
Old 04-04-2014, 03:15 AM   #2
TheIndependentAquarius
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,633
Blog Entries: 29

Rep: Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnanthaP View Post
(c) Keep the old name for old threads.

I for one would prefer option "c" since once it is posted on LQ, it becomes public.
The person might be having some embarrassing posts
associated with the old user name which might be the
reason for his/her name change request, and option C
might defeat the purpose?

The person might be being stalked by some other X
person which might be the reason for his/her name change
request, and option C might defeat the purpose?

The person might be wanting his/her old user name to
simply disappear from the internet for whatever
undisclosed xyz reasons, and option C might defeat the
purpose?
 
Old 04-04-2014, 10:10 AM   #3
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 10,609

Rep: Reputation: 2652Reputation: 2652Reputation: 2652Reputation: 2652Reputation: 2652Reputation: 2652Reputation: 2652Reputation: 2652Reputation: 2652Reputation: 2652Reputation: 2652
Due to the database layout, (c) really isn't technically feasible. Thanks for the feedback.

--jeremy
 
Old 04-04-2014, 01:56 PM   #4
rknichols
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Distribution: CentOS
Posts: 1,603

Rep: Reputation: 670Reputation: 670Reputation: 670Reputation: 670Reputation: 670Reputation: 670
If the user answers "No" in option (b), isn't that the same as the (non-feasible) option (c)?

What am I missing here?
 
Old 04-06-2014, 11:44 AM   #5
cynwulf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Distribution: OpenBSD, DragonFly BSD
Posts: 1,407

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnanthaP View Post
(c) Keep the old name for old threads.

I for one would prefer option "c" since once it is posted on LQ, it becomes public.
Which is the same as LQ not changing the name and that person making a new account...

But what brought this on... not much on TV today?
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-08-2014, 12:23 AM   #6
Randicus Draco Albus
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2011
Location: Wallowing in a pit of despair.
Distribution: OpenBSD
Posts: 1,380
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 418Reputation: 418Reputation: 418Reputation: 418Reputation: 418
I agree. It seems quite simple to me. Either change the user name (associated with that account) or start a new account with a new name. Personally, I think someone having posts under two names using the same account is a bad idea. Confusing? Looks schizophrenic?
 
Old 04-08-2014, 12:48 AM   #7
sundialsvcs
Guru
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: SE Tennessee, USA
Distribution: Gentoo, LFS
Posts: 5,455

Rep: Reputation: 1172Reputation: 1172Reputation: 1172Reputation: 1172Reputation: 1172Reputation: 1172Reputation: 1172Reputation: 1172Reputation: 1172
It would depend entirely upon how the underlying forum-software was designed: does the "posts" table (say ...) contain the actual login-name (string ...) of the user in question, or does it contain a numeric foreign-key to a "users" table from which the login-name is obtained?
 
Old 04-08-2014, 02:13 AM   #8
LinBox2013
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2013
Posts: 33

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
How about simply an alias that links back to the main account? I have belonged to forums that have had a login name and an alias feature. Have all old threads stay as they are and anyone whom clicks on them taken to your account. Seems like it would work to me. One account everything linked and the only thing changeable is the name on that account, not the account itself.

I have lost my old account on here due to a type of hack (long story). I would also like to request a mobile feature for changing a password. I lost my email address due to the hack (not really a hack long story) and had no way to retrieve my account, plus I changed it for security reasons. The alias would have fixed the security issue and a mobile ability to change my password would have fixed my email problem.

I would have liked to keep my old account but lost it. I registered my old account in 2003 .

Last edited by LinBox2013; 04-08-2014 at 02:17 AM.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] How can I change file permissions in windows ntfs partition.Even root can't change it e3399 Linux - Newbie 3 03-02-2011 11:54 PM
WEP Encryption Key:26chars_what choices must change in ubuntu 9.10 for the new change lse123 Linux - Newbie 1 03-02-2010 03:38 AM
is there a linux 'change' prog (like old dos 1) for quick change of text in files? johnemac General 2 06-15-2009 12:22 PM
Cannot Change GNOME Menu Items to add/change Item for Mozilla 1.2 After Upgrade metoome General 0 03-27-2004 01:19 AM
Cannot Change GNOME Menu Items to add/change Item for Mozilla 1.3 After Upgrade SForsgren Linux - General 4 03-27-2004 12:43 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:06 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration