LinuxQuestions.org
LinuxAnswers - the LQ Linux tutorial section.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > LQ Suggestions & Feedback
User Name
Password
LQ Suggestions & Feedback Do you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Search this Thread
Old 11-19-2009, 05:28 PM   #1
jens
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Belgium
Distribution: Debian, Slackware, Fedora
Posts: 1,046

Rep: Reputation: 82
Lq iso


Hi.
I'm sure this has been mentioned before, but the stats from lq iso are not just confusing, they simply can't be correct.

Most dowloaded over last 30 days:

OpenSolaris 2009.06 (130585)
Red Hat Linux 9 (Shrike) (26224)
Linux XP 2006 SR2 (6556)
Fedora 11 (3981)
Damn Small Linux 4.4.10 (2396)
Debian 3.0r2 (woody) (1549)
Ubuntu 9.10 (1427)
Gentoo Linux 10.0 (1332)
openSUSE 11.1 (1319)
Fedora 8 (1157)
Linpus Linux Live 9.2 (1087)
Linpus Linux 9.6 (991)
PCLinuxOS MiniMe 2008 (984)
KNOPPIX 6.0 (943)
MandrakeMove 9.2 (893)

http://iso.linuxquestions.org/

OpenSolaris: ... nr1?

RH9: nr2? Should be removed (not just a warning while still keeping all mirrors). This belongs in a museum.

Debian: Woody? that's 3 versions behind and unsupported.

...

Am I missing something obvious?

Last edited by jens; 11-19-2009 at 06:02 PM.
 
Old 11-19-2009, 06:53 PM   #2
smeezekitty
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: washington U.S.
Distribution: Damn Small Linux, KateOs, M$ Ickdows Vista, My own OS
Posts: 2,094

Rep: Reputation: 104Reputation: 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by jens View Post
Hi.
I'm sure this has been mentioned before, but the stats from lq iso are not just confusing, they simply can't be correct.

Most dowloaded over last 30 days:

OpenSolaris 2009.06 (130585)
Red Hat Linux 9 (Shrike) (26224)
Linux XP 2006 SR2 (6556)
Fedora 11 (3981)
Damn Small Linux 4.4.10 (2396)
Debian 3.0r2 (woody) (1549)
Ubuntu 9.10 (1427)
Gentoo Linux 10.0 (1332)
openSUSE 11.1 (1319)
Fedora 8 (1157)
Linpus Linux Live 9.2 (1087)
Linpus Linux 9.6 (991)
PCLinuxOS MiniMe 2008 (984)
KNOPPIX 6.0 (943)
MandrakeMove 9.2 (893)

http://iso.linuxquestions.org/

OpenSolaris: ... nr1?
true, at this rate, evreyone would be running *nix.
Quote:
RH9: nr2? Should be removed (not just a warning while still keeping all mirrors). This belongs in a museum.

Debian: Woody? that's 3 versions behind and unsupported.

...

Am I missing something obvious?
some classes strictly require RHL.
 
Old 11-19-2009, 07:11 PM   #3
jens
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Belgium
Distribution: Debian, Slackware, Fedora
Posts: 1,046

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 82
Quote:
Originally Posted by smeezekitty View Post

some classes strictly require RHL.
That would be RHEL, centos or even fedora.

RH9 doesn't even work on modern hardware.
Do they require useless and outdated Debian 3.0 software as well?
 
Old 11-20-2009, 01:02 AM   #4
smeezekitty
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: washington U.S.
Distribution: Damn Small Linux, KateOs, M$ Ickdows Vista, My own OS
Posts: 2,094

Rep: Reputation: 104Reputation: 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by jens View Post
That would be RHEL, centos or even fedora.

RH9 doesn't even work on modern hardware.
Do they require useless and outdated Debian 3.0 software as well?
even so, it should not be removed because if people want it, why take it away?
 
Old 11-20-2009, 02:59 AM   #5
Nylex
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,357

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by smeezekitty View Post
even so, it should not be removed because if people want it, why take it away?
Because people shouldn't be installing such old and unsupported software now. Surely there are many security holes in such software that haven't been fixed? If people have older systems already installed and they're maintaining them, obviously that's fine. However, I don't really see the point in installing unsupported software from scratch if there's newer, software available.
 
Old 11-20-2009, 10:25 AM   #6
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 9,110

Rep: Reputation: 2401Reputation: 2401Reputation: 2401Reputation: 2401Reputation: 2401Reputation: 2401Reputation: 2401Reputation: 2401Reputation: 2401Reputation: 2401Reputation: 2401
A couple comments:

* The high OpenSolaris 2009.06 download number is likely to result of a broken bot or something similar. I'll look into it.

* Keep in mind that LQ ISO simply links to official mirrors and does not host any downloads. Our current policy is to link to any distro version that remains actively archived on the official mirrors.

Thanks for the feedback.

--jeremy
 
Old 11-20-2009, 10:37 AM   #7
damgar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: dallas, tx
Distribution: Slackware - current multilib/gsb Arch
Posts: 1,661
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 162Reputation: 162
I've been thinking of installing and old(er) linux for the simple reason that my first experience with linux (and last until a few months ago) was 8 or 9 years ago and I remember being traumatized by it and would now like a little revenge and a use for some ancient hardware I can't bring myself to throw away since it still boots despite total neglect for GKHL. Or really just to force myself to learn some of the things that I don't HAVE to know in order to simply run linux. Also my favorite classes when I was in school were the ones that had pretty nice dedicated labs full of hardware the school would have otherwise scrapped. You learned A LOT just to get something to behave and you weren't in trouble if you broke something. Just had to stay late and fix it!
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Mounting ISO Images With Furius ISO Mount On Ubuntu 8.04 Desktop LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 09-26-2008 04:30 PM
LXer: ISO Master - GUI Tool to edit ISO Images in openSUSE LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 08-15-2008 10:10 AM
Iomojo camera server iso is not recognized as a viable iso format in K3B. RHLinuxGUY Linux - Distributions 2 06-12-2006 03:02 PM
RHEL CDs: made iso, mounted iso, exported dir - still asks for CD :( guest Linux - Newbie 1 04-08-2005 12:37 PM
Does anyone Know how to open either .iso.rz or these .iso.xdelta,.iso.bz2,.iso.lzma?? maximalred Debian 5 06-09-2004 06:15 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:00 PM.

Main Menu
 
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration