LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Hi.
I'm sure this has been mentioned before, but the stats from lq iso are not just confusing, they simply can't be correct.
Most dowloaded over last 30 days:
OpenSolaris 2009.06 (130585)
Red Hat Linux 9 (Shrike) (26224)
Linux XP 2006 SR2 (6556)
Fedora 11 (3981)
Damn Small Linux 4.4.10 (2396)
Debian 3.0r2 (woody) (1549)
Ubuntu 9.10 (1427)
Gentoo Linux 10.0 (1332)
openSUSE 11.1 (1319)
Fedora 8 (1157)
Linpus Linux Live 9.2 (1087)
Linpus Linux 9.6 (991)
PCLinuxOS MiniMe 2008 (984)
KNOPPIX 6.0 (943)
MandrakeMove 9.2 (893)
Distribution: Damn Small Linux, KateOs, M$ Ickdows Vista, My own OS
Posts: 2,094
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by jens
Hi.
I'm sure this has been mentioned before, but the stats from lq iso are not just confusing, they simply can't be correct.
Most dowloaded over last 30 days:
OpenSolaris 2009.06 (130585)
Red Hat Linux 9 (Shrike) (26224)
Linux XP 2006 SR2 (6556)
Fedora 11 (3981)
Damn Small Linux 4.4.10 (2396)
Debian 3.0r2 (woody) (1549)
Ubuntu 9.10 (1427)
Gentoo Linux 10.0 (1332)
openSUSE 11.1 (1319)
Fedora 8 (1157)
Linpus Linux Live 9.2 (1087)
Linpus Linux 9.6 (991)
PCLinuxOS MiniMe 2008 (984)
KNOPPIX 6.0 (943)
MandrakeMove 9.2 (893)
even so, it should not be removed because if people want it, why take it away?
Because people shouldn't be installing such old and unsupported software now. Surely there are many security holes in such software that haven't been fixed? If people have older systems already installed and they're maintaining them, obviously that's fine. However, I don't really see the point in installing unsupported software from scratch if there's newer, software available.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 8,993
Rep:
A couple comments:
* The high OpenSolaris 2009.06 download number is likely to result of a broken bot or something similar. I'll look into it.
* Keep in mind that LQ ISO simply links to official mirrors and does not host any downloads. Our current policy is to link to any distro version that remains actively archived on the official mirrors.
I've been thinking of installing and old(er) linux for the simple reason that my first experience with linux (and last until a few months ago) was 8 or 9 years ago and I remember being traumatized by it and would now like a little revenge and a use for some ancient hardware I can't bring myself to throw away since it still boots despite total neglect for GKHL. Or really just to force myself to learn some of the things that I don't HAVE to know in order to simply run linux. Also my favorite classes when I was in school were the ones that had pretty nice dedicated labs full of hardware the school would have otherwise scrapped. You learned A LOT just to get something to behave and you weren't in trouble if you broke something. Just had to stay late and fix it!
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.