LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602
Original Poster
Rep:
The bug reporting mechanism at LQ is being overhauled over the next couple weeks. I've fixed the reviews issue you were seeing. Thanks for the bug report.
(Recap of problem: "Code" blocks wider than the screen do get displayed w/ individual horizontal scroll bars, but they scroll only a few pixels & are so wide they trigger a horizontal scroll bar for the whole browser window.
While this issue is being looked at, I'll point out that under the old software, code boxes could present this kind of problem on 800x600 screens. I.e. the code box was taller and/or wider than the browser display area causing frustrating juggling games with both the main and code box's scroll bars. Hopefully this can get corrected for all screen sizes in the new software. (Am I correct that the website can find out the size of the browser window? Particularly with Java Script enabled?)
@archtoad6,
Yeah, I have a new notebook with a 1280x800, but I generally only use it when I need something portable. I just fumble it too badly for general use.
Is it piling on to 2nd pusrob's report about the "Spell Check" button in Advanced edit? I really missed it earlier this am. (I am almost fanatical about spell checking everything before submitting.)
Is it piling on to 2nd pusrob's report about the "Spell Check" button in Advanced edit? I really missed it earlier this am. (I am almost fanatical about spell checking everything before submitting.)
Have you considered temporarily activating your browser's spell check feature, if available, while the problem is being fixed? Just a thought.
This isn't a problem really, but the menu you get when you click someone's username in a thread appears even if you don't click the username but click anywhere on the same line in the box where the user's info is. E.g. I can click slightly left of the word "The" in jeremy's post above and still get the menu. Is it meant to be like that?!
Edit: Oh, I've only just realised my title's been changed. Thanks jeremy!
The editor windows sizes should be much better ...
Yes. Much better. Thanks
I am testing this with this post. On my 800x600 system, the smilies on this edit box are only accessible as a drop down menu from the top. But
that is OK by me.
EDIT: I just noticed the link back to the original post in "the Originally Posted by ..." line in quotes. Cool.
Last edited by blackhole54; 08-17-2007 at 02:07 AM.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602
Original Poster
Rep:
* The smilies are still available from the editor (or, of course, by typing them in manually).
* I believe the DHTML popup always came up in that manner
Problem #1
I have visited this thread 2ce today from links in e-mail msgs.:
1st, from one I received by subscribing to the thread,
2nd, from one I received by subscribing to the forum.
There was a minor but curious difference: #1 showed the entire thread, but #2 only displayed through post #24 (I have "Show 40 Posts Per Page" set in my LQ options) until I did an F5 refresh (in Konq. 3.3.2). I never noticed this behavior before the upgrade.
This brings me to a suggestion: how hard would it be to have the thread links provided in forum subscription e-mails include the same "&goto=newpost" that the thread subscription e-mails do? Would that also cure this problem?
Problem #2
The [check message length] & [fixed font] links are gone since yesterday.
Not sure if this is related to the code upgrade, but I've had a problem reporting a thread today. When trying to report this thread, I get: "The title that you have entered is too long (92 characters). Please shorten it to 85 characters long."
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.