LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
I've a suggestion. What if you find a way to automatically lock old threads that haven't been touched for 12+ months? They should just be locked, not removed, because maybe they still have important information on them. However, it happens really often in this forum that a newcomer "ressurrect" a 2 yo thread on General for no reason whatsoever. Usually is one of those threads "Windows Vs Linux" or "I hate Linux" kind of thing.
Even if the thread is a serious thread (with a real problem), a 2 years old thread don't add much for the current distributions, considering how fast the open-source development moves.
If locking a thread is not an option, I'd like to suggest at least a "warning" message to when somebody tries to bring one of those oldies back to life, like a confirm dialog or something. I doubt this method would be as efficient as the one with locking old threads, but at least it's something... I guess...
I think this was discussed once before. The best solution I can remember being mentioned was to remove the quick reply box and replace it with a message saying "Please note that this thread is over X months old and has not received a reply in X months, in most cases we would recommend starting a new thread if this is regarding a new issue."
This lets people reply to it using the reply page (which would also include the message) if the issue is still valid but not reply accidently.
Thanks. That is one of my favorite threads on General. A few screenshots there could be considered "art" . Still, I mean to lock untouched, dead old threads where nobody is posting anymore. The screenshots gets one post almost everyday, so it's very alive.
Good idea about the quick reply box by the way
Last edited by Mega Man X; 04-09-2006 at 07:21 AM.
I was going to post a suggestion, but this seems an appropriate thread to place this in.
I was just thinking that it would be nice to know when a particular thread was started without opening it. You currently post the name of the OP, but I think it would be nice to see the date of the first post next to th OP's name as well. The time is not important as I would like mainly to know at a glance if a 3 year old thread has been bumped by someone that was not paying attention.
The suggestions you have offered above seem like a start, but I still think this would be helpful.
Instead of starting a new thread requesting better guards on old threads. I'll just tack this onto on old thread on the subject.
Whatever happened to this topic?
I guess the Quick Reply area was missing when I went to reply to this thread, but that wasn't enough of a warning. Nothing really rubs my nose in the fact that I am resurrecting a dead thread. I need more of a clue (I can be a bit dense).
Someone else added an answer to the end of dead thread. So I thought it was a new thread. I thought all the answers missed the point so I added a better one. Only after posting I realized it had been a dead thread. (So I edited my response away).
I know at some point automation can't substitute for intelligence. Some dead threads are legitimately reopened.
But I've made this same mistake a few time before (follow on after someone posts a new answer to a dead thread).
It would be great if you could think of some way to highlight the first post after a long gap in time as such, so anyone reading the thread is reminded to notice the dates in case they matter. So after someone makes the mistake CrazyToon made in that thread, someone else won't follow.
It also would be nice to discourage the original mistake a bit more clearly.
Can you change the "Post Reply" button to a "Reopen Old Thread" button when the last post is really old? The button could do exactly the same thing as "Post Reply" just look different.
Since this topic has been resurrected, I'll suggest that any thread over 2 years old should be closed automatically. I just watched a newcomer--in good faith--adding some helpful words to a 4.5 year old thread----I'm pretty sure that none of the original participants have been around for awhile.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
As mentioned, we already disable the QRB for old threads. I'd have no problems also including some big bold note or even AJAX popup indicating the thread is old on a new post submit. That being said we have no plans to lock old threads indiscriminately. It's not really inline with the LQ way of thinking.
I'd have no problems also including some big bold note or even AJAX popup indicating the thread is old on a new post submit.
Hopefully you mean something one would see before typing the response, not on submit.
Anything that makes it more obvious could cut down that error. But I think simpler is better.
Since you're already rid of quick response, your remaining focus should be on the "Post Reply" button. I'll repeat my suggestion in case you missed it, to change the text inside that button when the last post is over age X.
If you don't like that idea, I hope you can put something either near enough that button you can't miss it or first pop up after you press that button.
That being said we have no plans to lock old threads indiscriminately. It's not really inline with the LQ way of thinking
Glad to hear it. I would not suggest taking away the ability to reopen a stale thread. Just take away the ease of doing it by accident.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
From a UI perspective, I would probably have the text box after clicking "Post Reply" be greyed out with a note explaining the thread was old, along with a dismiss button - but I'm open to further feedback on that.