LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > LQ Suggestions & Feedback
User Name
Password
LQ Suggestions & Feedback Do you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 04-05-2012, 06:24 AM   #1
syg00
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Distribution: Lots ...
Posts: 12,118

Rep: Reputation: 985Reputation: 985Reputation: 985Reputation: 985Reputation: 985Reputation: 985Reputation: 985Reputation: 985
Locking old threads


Yeah, I know, this has been hammered to death.

Jeremy, how about a rethink. I offer this as evidence.
First post from a new user.
 
Old 04-05-2012, 06:27 AM   #2
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,378

Rep: Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963
I'm on your side. I can imagine a possibly more rigorous system to deal with this that might make locking not required, but clearly the existing warning page is not doing a good enough job. Maybe insert an email stage or something, "you asked to post to an ancient thread, if you really want to, click the link in this email..."
 
Old 04-05-2012, 06:41 AM   #3
k3lt01
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Distribution: Debian Wheezy, Jessie, Sid/Experimental, playing with Slackware 14.
Posts: 2,583

Rep: Reputation: 534Reputation: 534Reputation: 534Reputation: 534Reputation: 534Reputation: 534
Here is another one, hasn't been touched in 12 months until someone comes along and gives advice, that was wrong anyway, to the OP who later tells us he gave up on it ages ago. I don't know how may times I have commented about how long a thread has been "asleep" after someone has come along and resurrected it from its grave. They must be actively searching for the oldest threads they can find that they think they can answer even if the answer is wrong.
 
Old 04-05-2012, 08:01 AM   #4
jlinkels
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Bonaire
Distribution: Debian Lenny/Squeeze/Wheezy/Sid
Posts: 4,053

Rep: Reputation: 484Reputation: 484Reputation: 484Reputation: 484Reputation: 484
I don't care too much about necroposting, however, the post syg00 is pointing at (http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...rchive-326716/) sounds so much like botspeak.

jlinkels
 
Old 04-05-2012, 10:35 AM   #5
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 10,316

Rep: Reputation: 2612Reputation: 2612Reputation: 2612Reputation: 2612Reputation: 2612Reputation: 2612Reputation: 2612Reputation: 2612Reputation: 2612Reputation: 2612Reputation: 2612
While I am still against closing old posts (it just doesn't make sense to me that we tell new members to search before they post, and then close old threads), it does appear that at some point the warning message on old threads and the QRB being disabled ceased functionality correctly. I'm looking into it now.

--jeremy
 
Old 04-06-2012, 08:15 PM   #6
dugan
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 4,565

Rep: Reputation: 1394Reputation: 1394Reputation: 1394Reputation: 1394Reputation: 1394Reputation: 1394Reputation: 1394Reputation: 1394Reputation: 1394Reputation: 1394
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlinkels View Post
I don't care too much about necroposting, however, the post syg00 is pointing at (http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...rchive-326716/) sounds so much like botspeak.

jlinkels
It's been removed, so apparently it was.

Almost all of the necroposts I can remember seeing on this forum were by bots. If you think about it, this makes sense; a real person needs a certain amount of clue to be using the search function in the first place, and a person of that quality wouldn't post unless he had something relevant to say.

A bot, on the other hand, probably just searches for the body of the message the it intends to post, and then responds to the top hit (the one with the most "appropriate" collection of keywords).

I'm wondering if this can be used as the basis for a bot trap...

Last edited by dugan; 04-06-2012 at 09:00 PM.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Locking old threads syg00 LQ Suggestions & Feedback 7 12-30-2011 11:52 AM
[SOLVED] Can two threads safely work on a linked list without locking? yaplej Programming 8 11-11-2010 06:18 AM
some threads are become unnoticed because of large number of continious threads deepak_cucek LQ Suggestions & Feedback 9 08-20-2009 11:21 PM
Locking really old threads automatically? Mega Man X LQ Suggestions & Feedback 20 03-24-2009 03:33 PM
Java threads listed using kill -3 does not contain all threads found using ps -auxww coneheed Programming 2 11-14-2005 08:57 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:54 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration