[SOLVED] Google just said LQ was an "attack site".
LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Distribution: Debian Wheezy, Jessie, Sid/Experimental, playing with LFS.
Originally Posted by tallship
In case anyone is reading this incorrectly, it has absolutely nothing to do w/LQ, but rather, Google Lying!
I didn't trust it when it happened in my browser, but was willing to concede that something was amiss at LQ; yet I certainly trust Google much less today for lying, now that the lies are documented in this thread.
Lies? Sorry but I don't go for the conspiracy theory. These things are only as infallible as the people who create them and nothing in this world is infallible. The way I see it is Google made a mistake, just like you are making a mistake with your conspiracy theories. At least Google has rectified its mistake and given LQ a clean bill.