LinuxQuestions.org
Support LQ: Use code LQ3 and save $3 on Domain Registration
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > LQ Suggestions & Feedback
User Name
Password
LQ Suggestions & Feedback Do you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.

Notices

Closed Thread
 
Search this Thread
Old 03-04-2012, 12:54 PM   #1
k3lt01
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Distribution: Debian Wheezy, Jessie, Sid/Experimental, playing with LFS.
Posts: 2,679

Rep: Reputation: 558Reputation: 558Reputation: 558Reputation: 558Reputation: 558Reputation: 558
Giving of non technical non PC related advice in LQ


I have a concern about people giving non technical non PC related advice in LQ. I have been watching medical advice being given in various threads that can, and I know this from personal experience, be quite dangerous. I have tried discussing this with individuals and they still persist. My worry is someone will do something and exacerbate any medical issue they may have, or maybe even cause more, because they have taken advice from an internet forum (one that isn't medical related to make it worse).

I'm sorry if this causes an argument but I think it is more important that people actually see someone who is qualified for certain things than take advice over the internet. It is vitally important that things like medical issues are tested for and monitored, unfortunately testing and monitoring cannot be done over a forum where the individuals participating are anonymous. I know we are adults and are supposed to take responsibility for our own actions but who will take responsibility if something goes wrong?
 
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
Old 03-04-2012, 02:27 PM   #2
b0uncer
Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Distribution: CentOS, OS X
Posts: 5,131

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Well, if you are an adult, you take responsibility for yourself. Nobody (that is "adult" in the sense that s/he is able to look after her/himself) should just blindly follow advices read on the internet. Sure you could censor and silence persons that give questionable advices, but what for--you'd just be affecting the results, not the reason, and as such not helping anybody. To be able to speak (write) freely is a very profound right, and it should not be undermined even if there are some gray areas to it (giving it away has always led to problems). Censoring one thing in order to create something better typically leads to broadening of the censorship, and in the end something that few will like.

You can't stop people from making mistakes. If you let them make mistakes, they'll learn (either as persons or as a mankind), but if you try to prevent them from making mistakes, they'll just become careless and make even more mistakes. And since LQ is not a police state, policing the content in this way would in my opinion be an overkill (as long as the conversations stay in the general section). Writing about illegal things is already prohibited, if I'm correct.
 
Old 03-04-2012, 02:28 PM   #3
dugan
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 4,665

Rep: Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440
Quote:
Originally Posted by k3lt01 View Post
I have tried discussing this with individuals and they still persist.
Stop that. You have no right to tell other posters what they can and cannot discuss.

Last edited by dugan; 03-04-2012 at 03:00 PM.
 
3 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-04-2012, 03:12 PM   #4
prowla
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: UK
Distribution: RHEL 5 & 6, Ubuntu 10
Posts: 92

Rep: Reputation: 3
Ironically, this thread is doing the very thing it says is bad...
 
Old 03-04-2012, 03:53 PM   #5
Doc CPU
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Distribution: Mint, Debian, Gentoo, Win 2k/XP
Posts: 999

Rep: Reputation: 294Reputation: 294Reputation: 294
Hi there,

Quote:
Originally Posted by k3lt01 View Post
I have a concern about people giving non technical non PC related advice in LQ.
why?

Quote:
Originally Posted by k3lt01 View Post
I have been watching medical advice being given in various threads that can, and I know this from personal experience, be quite dangerous.
Yes, maybe. And sometimes people also ask for legal advice, or advice on what brand of product they should prefer, advice on social or even sexual matters.

So what? Many people talk about these things with their friends - so why not talk about them in a wider, more public audience? Actually, there are subjects I wouldn't like to discuss even with my closest friends, but rather with someone totally anonymous. Strangers aren't biased, they just know what I tell them, and their reaction can be taken genuine and without prejudice about me as a person.

Quote:
Originally Posted by k3lt01 View Post
I know we are adults and are supposed to take responsibility for our own actions but who will take responsibility if something goes wrong?
The people who took a layman's opinion for granted and relied on it. Who else? As you say, we're adults and should be able to make our own decision. Other people's opinions and advice may help us make a decision, but if somebody relies entirely on a stranger's word, he or she sure has bigger problems than that.

[X] Doc CPU
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-04-2012, 04:23 PM   #6
k3lt01
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Distribution: Debian Wheezy, Jessie, Sid/Experimental, playing with LFS.
Posts: 2,679

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 558Reputation: 558Reputation: 558Reputation: 558Reputation: 558Reputation: 558
When the advice can have deadly consequences there is a problem. I am willing to stop doing things if it can be shown that there are deadly consequences. Telling people they should do such and such without even having physically check them is against all medical oaths (at least in Australia). People self diagnosing illness has become problematic, it is on the news daily in Australia, and the internet is a huge part of that problem. Why risk someone else's life? That is my concern.

@Dugan, I haven't told anyone what they can or cannot discuss. Show me where I have done this! Discussing health issues is a part of life, giving medical advice when you don't even know the person isn't.

@Prowla, how? What have I said in my OP that gives you that idea? I haven't given any non technical advice in this thread nor have I given any medical advice (apart from the need to see a real doctor). Please show me where in this thread you believe I have done so.

EDIT: I see that a moderator has stepped in in one thread.

Last edited by k3lt01; 03-04-2012 at 04:25 PM. Reason: Just read a moderator reply in one thread.
 
Old 03-04-2012, 04:30 PM   #7
Doc CPU
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Distribution: Mint, Debian, Gentoo, Win 2k/XP
Posts: 999

Rep: Reputation: 294Reputation: 294Reputation: 294
Hi there,

Quote:
Originally Posted by k3lt01 View Post
@Dugan, I haven't told anyone what they can or cannot discuss. Show me where I have done this! Discussing health issues is a part of life, giving medical advice when you don't even know the person isn't.

@Prowla, how? What have I said in my OP that gives you that idea? I haven't given any non technical advice in this thread nor have I given any medical advice (apart from the need to see a real doctor). Please show me where in this thread you believe I have done so.
it looks to me like you don't distinguish between an advice and an order. Advice is something that can become a factor in making a decision, an order is something that someone else decides for me. Advice is always without obligation. Obliging without reflection isn't a fault of the person who gave the advice.

Just my 2 cents.

[X] Doc CPU
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-04-2012, 04:32 PM   #8
dugan
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 4,665

Rep: Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440
Quote:
Originally Posted by k3lt01 View Post
@Dugan, I haven't told anyone what they can or cannot discuss. Show me where I have done this!
I quoted the part where you mentioned doing so, and wrote my comment below it. Duh.

It's hard to see someone ignoring context like this and not conclude that it's intentional.

Last edited by dugan; 03-04-2012 at 04:39 PM.
 
Old 03-04-2012, 06:13 PM   #9
k3lt01
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Distribution: Debian Wheezy, Jessie, Sid/Experimental, playing with LFS.
Posts: 2,679

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 558Reputation: 558Reputation: 558Reputation: 558Reputation: 558Reputation: 558
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc CPU View Post
it looks to me like you don't distinguish between an advice and an order. Advice is something that can become a factor in making a decision, an order is something that someone else decides for me. Advice is always without obligation. Obliging without reflection isn't a fault of the person who gave the advice.

Just my 2 cents.

[X] Doc CPU
Advice given by people who claim medical authority yet will not give evidence and suggest others have no idea so you shouldn't listen to them is supposed to be pretty compelling don't you think?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dugan View Post
I quoted the part where you mentioned doing so, and wrote my comment below it. Duh.
Where in that quote does it say that I told someone not to say something? It does not, it says I tried discussing it with them and they still persist.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dugan View Post
It's hard to see someone ignoring context like this and not conclude that it's intentional.
Well you took what I said out of context, what should I conclude from that?

Again my concern is consequences to the person who is in need of medical assistance, not what you think of my post.
 
Old 03-04-2012, 06:20 PM   #10
dugan
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 4,665

Rep: Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440
Quote:
Originally Posted by k3lt01 View Post
Where in that quote does it say that I told someone not to say something? It does not, it says I tried discussing it with them and they still persist.
Which means that you told them not to do something. If you had "discussed" it in any other way, then you would not have added the "and they still persist".



Quote:
[X] Doc CPU
Advice given by people who claim medical authority yet will not give evidence and suggest others have no idea so you shouldn't listen to them is supposed to be pretty compelling don't you think?
Oh, you mean that what you deem to be bad advice is not compelling? Wouldn't that mean that it's not likely to cause harm? Maybe you should dial down the self righteousness a bit then?

Last edited by dugan; 03-04-2012 at 06:49 PM.
 
Old 03-04-2012, 07:06 PM   #11
k3lt01
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Distribution: Debian Wheezy, Jessie, Sid/Experimental, playing with LFS.
Posts: 2,679

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 558Reputation: 558Reputation: 558Reputation: 558Reputation: 558Reputation: 558
Quote:
Originally Posted by dugan View Post
Which means that you told them not to do something. If you had "discussed" it in any other way, then you would not have added the "and they still persist".
Dugan at no stage have I, unlike you who started your contribution to this thread by telling me not to do something, told anyone not to do something. I have discussed, unsuccessfully, my reasons for thinking this is a problem.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dugan View Post
Oh, you mean that what you deem to be bad advice is not compelling? Wouldn't that mean that it's not likely to cause harm?
No I mean, and you know quite well what I mean, that when someone states they have medical knowledge (through courses) and that others don't know what they are talking about they are trying to show they have a compelling argument to follow their advice.

On the other hand I have only been through (never had to study because I have personal experience, I know what it feels like to have certain symptoms and what following said advice would have done to me) a very serious illness. My concern, as I have said before, is possible consequences to the person in need of medical assistance, not what you think of my post. If you have no concern about peoples welfare then so be it, I do have concerns and will voice them.
 
Old 03-05-2012, 03:29 AM   #12
Doc CPU
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Distribution: Mint, Debian, Gentoo, Win 2k/XP
Posts: 999

Rep: Reputation: 294Reputation: 294Reputation: 294
Hi there,

Quote:
Originally Posted by k3lt01 View Post
Advice given by people who claim medical authority yet will not give evidence and suggest others have no idea so you shouldn't listen to them is supposed to be pretty compelling don't you think?
no, not up to that point.
For me, it takes convincing arguments supported by facts I can prove true doing my own research to take an advice seriously. A simple "You should do ..." or "If I were you, I'd never ...", or even a stronger phrase like "You must ..." is nearly worthless for me if it isn't supported by credible arguments and at least some trace of proof.
Even when I'm getting advice from professionals (whether it's in the medical, technical, legal or cultural domain), I don't accept it unreflected, but insist: Why?

Is it just me, does nobody else have a well-developed scepticism like this?

[X] Doc CPU
 
Old 03-05-2012, 04:44 AM   #13
H_TeXMeX_H
Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269
It's funny how someone can propose that nobody should give non-technical advice, and yet does it all the time.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-05-2012, 11:26 AM   #14
k3lt01
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Distribution: Debian Wheezy, Jessie, Sid/Experimental, playing with LFS.
Posts: 2,679

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 558Reputation: 558Reputation: 558Reputation: 558Reputation: 558Reputation: 558
Quote:
Originally Posted by H_TeXMeX_H View Post
It's funny how someone can propose that nobody should give non-technical advice, and yet does it all the time.
Is your block list malfunctioning?

I haven't given advice that could have devastating effects on some ones life.
 
Old 03-05-2012, 10:06 PM   #15
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 10,386

Rep: Reputation: 2626Reputation: 2626Reputation: 2626Reputation: 2626Reputation: 2626Reputation: 2626Reputation: 2626Reputation: 2626Reputation: 2626Reputation: 2626Reputation: 2626
Quote:
Originally Posted by k3lt01 View Post
I have a concern about people giving non technical non PC related advice in LQ. I have been watching medical advice being given in various threads that can, and I know this from personal experience, be quite dangerous. My worry is someone will do something and exacerbate any medical issue they may have, or maybe even cause more, because they have taken advice from an internet forum (one that isn't medical related to make it worse).
Members giving non-technical or non-PC related advice on LQ is certainly fine. That said, if you see advice that you legitimately think poses a medical risk (setting aside that no one should be taking medical advice from a Linux forum), please do use the Report button so a mod can evaluate the situation. You should also feel free to post your concerns in that thread.

--jeremy
 
  


Closed Thread


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Giving up on AD, need some server advice LinuxCowboy03 Linux - Server 36 10-07-2008 02:58 PM
Technical question. (related to striping) CleonII Linux - Hardware 7 05-28-2006 11:05 AM
Technical advice needed: Visual confirmation on web forms vharishankar General 5 03-09-2006 11:32 PM
Newbie server related question. Need advice. DeadPenguin Linux - Newbie 8 01-06-2006 02:04 PM
Need Advice - Science-Related Tech Job mijenks General 4 08-13-2004 04:21 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:42 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration