LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I thought it would be really nice if there would be a tag that would let you write in a monospaced font, which is useful when you want to write something as if if would show on your screen.
I'm not talking about [code] tags, I mean that something more like the [b], [i], and [u] tags, that would just change the font instead of putting it in a separate block.
I was wondering if this is impractical to implement, or if there is a reason not to, of just nobody thought of it?
I've been thinking about this issue recently and I believe I have a new point to raise.
Quote:
LQ already has support for a variety of fixed with fonts:
abcdefghijklm
nopqrstuvwxyz
--jeremy
abcdefghijklm
nopqrstuvwxyz
On my current setup "Courier New" doesn't give a fixed width font (see attached image), I can get fixed width using "monospace", but perhaps that won't work for someone else. And the problem with choosing a font isn't the bother of typing, it's the bother of picking a particular font when what I really want is a way to say "use any fixed width font".
Furthermore, I don't think I've ever seen a post using multiple fonts effectively, the only thing the FONT tag is used for is monospaced text, so I propose replacing the font selection dropdown menu with a fixed width button.
This is still an issue for me. jeremy seems to try to push it aside by saying "you can just type "[font=Courier New][/font]"", but that's very difficult. Especially in Quick Reply, where there is no pop-up font menu!
I still vote for either an [m] bbcode tag, or a button (that will be available in Quick Reply) to set the font to Courier New.
Note that another problem with Courier New is that many people (and the vast majority of Linux users) prefer a different fixed-width font, and have it set as their browser default. Why not use that?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.