LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
When I reverse back through a chain of pages (browser "<= Back" button) on your site, most often I get the following message.
Quote:
A script on this page may be busy,
or it may have stopped responding.
You can stop the script now, or
you can continue to see if the
script will complete.
Script: http://ap.lijit.com/sync:2
[X Stop Script] [v/ Continue]
And a similar message, but less frequently for this script.
The browser will freeze for as much as a minute before the error message actually appears. I have been getting similar messages on several sites recently and blame advertsments and html5.
yep.
adblock (or block origin these days), noscript and request policy.
the latter 2 are a PITA (<= a major pain in the backside) to use, but worth the effort in the long run.
reduces bandwidth and computer resources, increases privacy.
My recent experience with Firefox has been that new scripts break in older versions of the browser in just that way - they become unresponsive (probably related to responsive web design).
So if you are running an older Firefox you might try an updated version.
I am using Seamonkey 2.20, just recently upgraded from v1.0b. I tried v2.39 but didn't like it.
With some difficulty I just installed Adblocker and Ghostery. Finding a version of Abblocker combatable with v2.20 of Seamonkey took some time (Adblock Plus 2.3 for Firefox). I have not (in this little time since) had a stopped script here at LQ or elsewhere.
My original thought was that the advertisers were getting out of hand and might need a good slap.
I just backed through eight pages (as far as I could go without leaving the site) with Seamonkey 2.31 with NoScript installed and set to allow all on LQ on Slackware --Current and was not able to reproduce OP's problem.
I have encountered that error from time to time, most often on newspaper websites.
Distribution is Slackware 14.1, which ships Seamonkey 2.21, but for some reason had to revert to an earlier version.
I have been using 2.20 for quite some time and these problems are not new, but until I was bouncing around this site were fairly rare.
PS - I used the quote tags very deliberatly. The first encloses the text from a dialog (popup warning) box, not an error log. The second encloses only the http address of a second guilty script and nothing more. I did put some thought into it, and judged that code tags were not suitable (since "code" describes neither) and quote tags more appropriate for both.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.