[SOLVED] Didn't I used to have Senior Member status?
LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
This may be a silly question, but in looking into private messaging, etc. today, I noticed that I'm a "Member," and as such have some restrictions. I seem to remember years ago being a "Senior Member," back before LQ started making a bunch of changes, such as adding reputation, blogs, wikis, etc. Have the requirements changed since then? Am I just off my rocker? If you can help solve this mystery (and have been on LQ long enough to know the answer), I'd appreciate your insight.
Thanks!
--Dane
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
Thanks for the info, repo. I've seen something like that before, so I guess my question is whether the number of posts required has changed over the years. Any insight?
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 9,110
Rep:
We have not changed the number of posts required to have the Senior Member usertitle in many many years. You may be confusing the usertitle with the Senior Member usergroup (which is and has been 150 posts for a very long time), however.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.