LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > LQ Suggestions & Feedback
User Name
Password
LQ Suggestions & Feedback Do you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 07-14-2007, 09:33 AM   #1
pixellany
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Distribution: Arch/XFCE
Posts: 17,802

Rep: Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728
Close old threads?


I just saw a 3-year old thread to which a new helpful comment was posted. (Original audience long gone). I have seen this happen fairly often.

Would it make sense to automatically close any thread that has gone maybe 1-2 years without any posts? (Just one small step to reduce the clutter factor.)
 
Old 07-14-2007, 10:05 AM   #2
XavierP
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Lubuntu
Posts: 19,176
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430
They are normally locked with a message asking a potential poster to think again before adding their comment. The problem with locking down due to age is that the ethos of the site is that all the help here is accessible to all. Also, as we have seen recently, there are people out there with Red Hat 5.1 still running so they can add to the flow of even aged threads.
 
Old 07-14-2007, 10:24 AM   #3
pixellany
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Distribution: Arch/XFCE
Posts: 17,802

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728
I understand and support the logic and the policy.

An old thread is still useful to read--the advantage of closing would be to ensure that a new question gets answered in the context of the current state of development.

Suppose I posted a thread in the year 2004 asking for help on printing. There could be a lot of answers there that are--in 2007--no longer relevant (or possibly even wrong). If the thread gets re-opened 2-3 years later, someone can read all the old stuff and get thoroughly confused.

Ideally, the newborns would read all the old threads, and then ask a new question based on absorbing all that knowledge. As we know, that seldom happens---we just get a new question. Once that happens, better not to muddy the water with 3 year old answers.

Another consideration: Suppose you posted something back in 04 and I want to ask you for clarification? Since posting, you may have gone dormant, switched back to Windows, or worse. I would just get frustrated trying to find you.
 
Old 07-14-2007, 04:55 PM   #4
XavierP
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Lubuntu
Posts: 19,176
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430
That's true (the final paragraph, I mean) but I would hope that everyone here would look at the dates and make a common sense judgment based on the dates

The problem is that both locking and leaving open old threads have equal merit. I believe that Jeremy put the current system in place as the fairest compromise. As we have seen over the years, age of post is no barrier to creating similar threads....
 
Old 07-14-2007, 06:40 PM   #5
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 10,446

Rep: Reputation: 2632Reputation: 2632Reputation: 2632Reputation: 2632Reputation: 2632Reputation: 2632Reputation: 2632Reputation: 2632Reputation: 2632Reputation: 2632Reputation: 2632
We do remove the quick reply from older threads, which makes responding a more deliberate act. I don't foresee mass closing all older threads at this time. Thanks for the feedback.

--jeremy
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
close terminal mean close background process? Niceman2005 Linux - General 7 05-27-2010 02:58 PM
Threads - A way to close them out Harlin LQ Suggestions & Feedback 21 04-17-2006 04:49 AM
"Find all threads started by user" not showing all threads Nylex LQ Suggestions & Feedback 3 12-28-2005 08:28 PM
Java threads listed using kill -3 does not contain all threads found using ps -auxww coneheed Programming 2 11-14-2005 08:57 AM
Java Threads vs Native Threads rjmendez Programming 0 08-16-2004 05:58 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:12 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration