LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   LQ Suggestions & Feedback (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/lq-suggestions-and-feedback-7/)
-   -   Ban posts with 'Urgent', 'Help' as sole title. (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/lq-suggestions-and-feedback-7/ban-posts-with-urgent-help-as-sole-title-688016/)

SkinnerC 12-03-2008 09:07 AM

Ban posts with 'Urgent', 'Help' as sole title.
 
Can a filter be set up to stop all the threads that use 'Urgent' or 'Help' as a subject? It seems to me that the mods spend a lot of time reminding peeps that they need to be more descriptive in the subject line.

weibullguy 12-03-2008 09:49 AM

I agree it's a crappy title, but I don't think we should be filtering posts just because the poster doesn't know hacker etiquette. Banning their post just turns them off, doesn't teach them anything about HOW to post, and helps no one; their problem may actually be interesting regardless of the crummy title. You can always implement your own filter simply by not clicking on the posts with titles you don't like.

And, let's face it, the titles of your posts aren't real great either.

SkinnerC 12-03-2008 10:01 AM

Another bad subject
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by weibullguy (Post 3363078)
And, let's face it, the titles of your posts aren't real great either.

lol your right. *edited to prevent a flame war* I was just putting up a thought.

thecarpy 12-03-2008 10:07 AM

Well, a check (regex for example) on the Title field, to tell people not to use urgent/help in titles would be greatly appreciated.

Minimum title length of three words would be good as well .... what is the use of a title like "samba" or "linux"?

ronlau9 12-03-2008 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkinnerC (Post 3363029)
Can a filter be set up to stop all the threads that use 'Urgent' or 'Help' as a subject? It seems to me that the mods spend a lot of time reminding peeps that they need to be more descriptive in the subject line.

Using a meaning full thread tittle , is just as difficult as answering
a thread in a sort and correct way , without telling too much are too little

SkinnerC 12-03-2008 11:00 AM

Aparently I am out of line with this thread. Request it to be closed and I will return to my corner.

trickykid 12-03-2008 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by weibullguy (Post 3363078)
I agree it's a crappy title, but I don't think we should be filtering posts just because the poster doesn't know hacker etiquette.

I wouldn't necessarily call it hacker etiquette, more like forum etiquette.

jeremy 12-03-2008 12:24 PM

SkinnerC, while we have no plans to filter titles for words at this time (we do filter in that we currently PREVENT SHOUTING), you're certainly not out of line with this thread. Feedback and suggestions are always welcome here at LQ.

--jeremy

weibullguy 12-03-2008 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trickykid (Post 3363222)
I wouldn't necessarily call it hacker etiquette, more like forum etiquette.

The crummy subject complaint applies to more than fora. I base my claim on ESR's "How to Ask Questions the Smart Way", which states "In the world of hackers, the kind of answers you get to your technical questions depends as much on the way you ask the questions as on the difficulty of developing the answer." This great treatise specifically addresses Urgent et. al. subject lines and states, "Claiming urgency is very likely to be counter-productive: most hackers will simply delete such messages as rude and selfish attempts to elicit immediate and special attention."

So I maintain it is hacker etiquette rather than a more narrow forum etiquette. But, that's simply my opinion and only loosely related to this thread's subject so I'll shut up now.

XavierP 12-03-2008 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by weibullguy (Post 3363384)
The crummy subject complaint applies to more than fora. I base my claim on ESR's "How to Ask Questions the Smart Way", which states "In the world of hackers, the kind of answers you get to your technical questions depends as much on the way you ask the questions as on the difficulty of developing the answer." This great treatise specifically addresses Urgent et. al. subject lines and states, "Claiming urgency is very likely to be counter-productive: most hackers will simply delete such messages as rude and selfish attempts to elicit immediate and special attention."

So I maintain it is hacker etiquette rather than a more narrow forum etiquette. But, that's simply my opinion and only loosely related to this thread's subject so I'll shut up now.

It's not just restricted to hackers. Try going to a garage and grabbing the first mechanic you see and "I need urgent help now! My car is broken" and seeing exactly how much help you actually receive.

It's strictly polite to ask a proper question and to give the person you want help from as much information as you think is relevant. It is even more important in a situation where you are receiving free help and are, in fact, costing the helper in terms of time and effort.

Unfortunately, there is no magic bullet for this. This subject has been discussed time and again and the fact that we are still having it speaks volumes. Jeremy has implemented certain steps to prevent this but it hasn't helped (though I can't think how you could implement metrics to prove or disprove this).

The aim of LQ is to put few barriers in front of posters so that they want to come here and ask for help. We don't charge, we aim to be friendly and welcoming, we only ask for a simple email confirmation and you aren't forced to post here at all - we do have a large number of lurking members. In some ways we are a victim of our own success, in the early days we were part of the nerd hardcore and there was certainly some flaming of new members who didn't know how to post - this was, for the most part, a re-education thing. Now, as linux becomes more mainstream, our membership is no longer made up from IT geeks and other similar people and we have to adapt.

Whatever we do, we mustn't become the type of forum we try to stay apart from - elitist and unwelcoming. If that means that we have to endure the type of thread title and post we all love to hate, well, it's the price we pay.

weibullguy 12-03-2008 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XavierP (Post 3363493)
It's not just restricted to hackers.

Excellent point.
Quote:

Originally Posted by XavierP (Post 3363493)
Unfortunately, there is no magic bullet for this.

Doesn't have to be magical, most any bullet will do ;)

XavierP 12-03-2008 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by weibullguy (Post 3363502)
Doesn't have to be magical, most any bullet will do ;)

In which case, either we don't have enough them to get everyone, or the ones we do have aren't big enough to affect enough people :)

brianL 12-04-2008 06:53 AM

Just put a big banner at the top of the forums page:
Only use thread titles "Urgent!" or "HELP!!!" if your life's in danger.

H_TeXMeX_H 12-04-2008 08:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brianL (Post 3364157)
Just put a big banner at the top of the forums page:
Only use thread titles "Urgent!" or "HELP!!!" if your life's in danger.

Indeed, for example if you are running from a bear or mountain lion with your laptop, and you need "HEEEELLLLPPP!!!!111!@" getting sound working on it so you can try to scare the creature off.

archtoad6 12-04-2008 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XavierP (Post 3363493)
Now, as linux becomes more mainstream, our membership is no longer made up from IT geeks and other similar people and we have to adapt.

I respectfully disagree.

What we need to do is GENTLY make them adapt.


Remember, there is 400 year old mistranslation in the Sermon on the Mount -- It really said "The geek shall inherit the earth." :)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:11 AM.