I was recently informed that my signature stating "www.ipodlinux.org Cool OS for your Ipod." was advertising, yet the moderator said that maybe a change in the rules was in order because it is Open Source. I would not make any money if someone went to that site. I merely downloaded it and put it onto my Ipod and thought it was cool, so i put it in here for others to try out. The moderator stated:
"On a different matter, I have reffered your signature to the moderator and said
<<I suggest you review and talk with user ipodlinux 1) whether is signature is adhoc,
2) or whether rules about advertising should be rephrased in the case of open source. At the same time I do not want to drive the user of the board.
I thought it was an interesting ethical subject: can open source project be
advertised on LQ>>
I am no joy killer. It is a point on which LQ needs to take a decision.
In addition maybe you have not read the LQ rules, so maybe
you do not know you are borderline on this.
I am not the net police. As the moderators say
http://www.linuxquestions.org/rules.php
<<If you come across any violations to these guidelines or have any problems navigating the site, do not hesitate to let us know via email or the forums.>>
I hope you appreciate why I did that.
regards"
My answer to the " Can open source projects be advertised on LQ " is yes. I think that it is OK to advertise open source projects. What are your thoughts on this?