LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Jeremy asked the following question a few posts back:
Quote:
Some of the discussion in this thread makes me wonder if we should move from a purely "thanks" based system to something closer to an Amazon "found this helpful/useful" type system. Thoughts?
Aren't the two basically the same? A certain value is given to a certain post, only the naming is different. I'm still convinced that a thank you system, in whatever form, isn't needed and doesn't add anything to LQ.
The solution to all this is simple and self regulating: Just write a quick reply.
I always get a smile on my face if I read something like: Thanks mate, your solution works or an even simpler Thanks! and although it doesn't put a smile on my face, I'm also 'happy' with a negative response because I can act on that and hopefully set things strait. Normal human interaction........
I think the users would understand and use a "Did you find this post useful yes/no" button, more than the thumbs-up, which seems to either not get noticed or not be understood for the most part.
I agree with Druuna, I prefer the personal approach and like to post a "Thanks that fixed it" or get one back in return, as it's far more rewarding, but if we must have some automated mechanism, I'd prefer the "X out of Y found this useful" Amazon scheme to the current thanks scheme.
By the way, Isn't a thumbs up considered rude in some cultures? I remember something about Hitchhikers being warned not to use The Thumb in some countries because the locals consider it akin to giving someone The Finger. Just an observation.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602
Rep:
Linux and Open Source are very much meritocracies where thanks and attribution are very important. LQ also runs on very much the same currency. With that in mind, a properly implemented system of attribution demonstrably adds to LQ. I'd agree that a personal note is also very nice, but is a very different thing for a variety of reasons.
With that in mind, a properly implemented system of attribution demonstrably adds to LQ. I'd agree that a personal note is also very nice, but is a very different thing for a variety of reasons.
--jeremy
I agree and I think it helps getting the newer members to contribute with being careful and informative with their posts. Look at it from this view - thumb up is better than a finger up.
Last edited by Larry Webb; 08-05-2009 at 12:50 PM.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.