| Linux - Wireless Networking This forum is for the discussion of wireless networking in Linux. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
04-18-2006, 03:25 PM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: ~
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.04
Posts: 843
Rep:
|
too far from AP
I have this computer with ubuntu with a wifi PCMCIA card that I'm taking care for someone.
The range sucks on that thing. It's far enough that getting an IP with DHCP takes around 30 seconds. It's not bad, but I am being asked to reduce the time so the auth and DHCP is done transparently on the spot.
It's none of linux's fault. The range sucks on Windows or Linux. Under Windows ME, it would crash when comming out of hibernation (latest driver and client). Under linux, it needed a driver upgrade for stability and script tweaking for convinience with initng. Of course, Windows and Linux competes in my environment, and linux can't help but keeping getting blamed since it's new.
I keep insisting it's the distance, the cheap hardware, but not linux's fault....
It's a madwifi card.
I ran athctrl -i wifi0 -d 50 in a wild attempt to make the connection more stable.
Is there anything I can do until I implement mesh networking on my network?
|
|
|
|
04-18-2006, 07:01 PM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Paris
Distribution: Slackware forever.
Posts: 2,178
Rep:
|
Latest madwifi drivers should be better for you. You can also do some static IP config. Maybe increase the transmit power, but i don't know how to do that.
|
|
|
|
04-18-2006, 07:32 PM
|
#3
|
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: ~
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.04
Posts: 843
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I have the latest (relatively, they update each week or so no?)
Transmit power would be iwconfig ath0 txpower 17db or something like that (man iwconfig). Madwifi has been known not to work too good with transmit power, but it's worth a try.
nice nickname by the way. 
|
|
|
|
04-19-2006, 05:41 AM
|
#4
|
|
Member
Registered: May 2003
Location: Wageningen, the Netherlands
Distribution: OS X
Posts: 483
Rep:
|
Does the computer roam between APs? If not, then you could try Disabling Background Scanning in Client Mode. I am not sure whether this will really help much though.
|
|
|
|
04-19-2006, 02:54 PM
|
#5
|
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: ~
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.04
Posts: 843
Original Poster
Rep:
|
This will remove the 2 second scan each 2 minutes, but doesn't make the link any stronger, or increase sensitivity theoretically.
By the iwconfig output, it says that the current txpower is 15dBm. I could try cranking it up to 17 and/or 18, but it's a weak card, it might not go any higher.
So far:
dBm adujustment
sensitivity adjusment
disable background scanning
static IP.
I'll check those out. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
10-02-2006, 12:11 AM
|
#6
|
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Pennsylvainia
Distribution: Slackware / Debian / *Ubuntu / Opensuse / Solaris uname: Brian Cooney
Posts: 503
Rep:
|
if getting a stronger card is an option, perhaps look into a seano card (just cross check that the card will work under linux) as they have some VERY hot cards (200-400 mw instead of the normal 50ish tops)
|
|
|
|
10-02-2006, 11:26 AM
|
#7
|
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: ~
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.04
Posts: 843
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I'll check that out! thanks.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:40 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|