| Linux - Virtualization and Cloud This forum is for the discussion of all topics relating to Linux Virtualization and Linux Cloud platforms. Xen, KVM, OpenVZ, VirtualBox, VMware, Linux-VServer and all other Linux Virtualization platforms are welcome. OpenStack, CloudStack, ownCloud, Cloud Foundry, Eucalyptus, Nimbus, OpenNebula and all other Linux Cloud platforms are welcome. Note that questions relating solely to non-Linux OS's should be asked in the General forum. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
03-07-2010, 10:16 AM
|
#1
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Mar 2010
Posts: 14
Rep:
|
how to provide vm's access to FC SAN through the host HBA module?
Hi,
does any body got any experience on setting up a virtualized environment in which the vm's can access a fiber channel SAN storage? the host access the SAN through its own HBA, but the hba is not recognized inside the virtual machines (KVM virtual machines). does any one tried such a scenario? I use ubuntu on my systems, both host and guests. thanks.
|
|
|
|
03-17-2010, 05:49 PM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Iceland
Distribution: Fedora 14, CentOS, FreeNAS
Posts: 126
Rep:
|
Fb san
Hi.
I'm not familiar with the KVM solution but we use VMWare ESXi and run several CentOS servers on that and also some Windoze servers. We used to have a Wind... server running on one blade but moved it to VM and we were able to make the logical drives on the SAN (which were available to the server when it was on a separate blade) available to the Wind... server on VM. Not sure it's what you're asking but maybe it points you in some directions...
|
|
|
|
03-18-2010, 02:33 AM
|
#3
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Mar 2010
Posts: 14
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Hi
you are right, vmWare works well with hba's, and they are simply accessible through the guest system(at least windows guests). and I'm trying to do the same on kvm.
|
|
|
|
03-19-2010, 01:00 PM
|
#4
|
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2007
Location: Israel
Distribution: RHEL,Fedora
Posts: 716
Rep:
|
what you need is called PCI passthrough. It allows you to provide a VM with a PCI device. This is still not supported on RHEL/CentOS afaik, but in the newest versions should be possible.
|
|
|
|
04-11-2010, 02:15 PM
|
#5
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: May 2009
Posts: 25
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chakoshi
Hi,
does any body got any experience on setting up a virtualized environment in which the vm's can access a fiber channel SAN storage? the host access the SAN through its own HBA, but the hba is not recognized inside the virtual machines (KVM virtual machines). does any one tried such a scenario? I use ubuntu on my systems, both host and guests. thanks.
|
Just curious - why would you want to have the VM access the SAN directly? Would it not be easier to abstract that part away and have the VM running on a virtual disk?
|
|
|
|
04-12-2010, 03:23 AM
|
#6
|
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2007
Location: Israel
Distribution: RHEL,Fedora
Posts: 716
Rep:
|
nikwax, easier, but with the extra overhead, databases and other i/o heavy apps will suffer a performance hit
|
|
|
|
04-12-2010, 03:24 AM
|
#7
|
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2007
Location: Israel
Distribution: RHEL,Fedora
Posts: 716
Rep:
|
nikwax, easier, but with the extra overhead, databases and other i/o heavy apps will suffer a performance hit
|
|
|
|
04-13-2010, 02:06 PM
|
#8
|
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Distribution: CentOS 2.6.18-53.1.4.el5
Posts: 770
Rep:
|
We use VMware with CentOS 5.x as the guest OS. Then you need to install the iscsi-initiator-utils package and get the initiator name from /etc/iscsi/initiatorname.iscsi. There's more to it than that but Im not sure how to tell you how to do it on ubuntu.
|
|
|
|
04-13-2010, 03:22 PM
|
#9
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: May 2009
Posts: 25
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyasny
nikwax, easier, but with the extra overhead, databases and other i/o heavy apps will suffer a performance hit
|
Sure - but you lose some of the benefits of virtualization. Many (most?) applications will work just fine virtualized, including databases and exchange servers. Big databases can be a special case though.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:26 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|