Linux - VirtualizationThis forum is for the discussion of all topics relating to Linux Virtualization. Xen, KVM, OpenVZ, VirtualBox, VMware, Linux-VServer and all other Linux Virtualization platforms are welcome. Note that questions relating solely to non-Linux OS's should be asked in the General forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Hi i would like to run Linux on windows 7.. I cannot make partitions that's why i can't make my computer dual boot. So whats the better virtualization software to run my opensuse with full kde under windows operating system?
It is fine to run in virtual machines. In fact you may find they run so good you will never dual boot again.
Subjective.
I'd say.
Vmplayer 3 on Windows 7 seems to be less processor intensive as Virtualbox.
Virtualbox would be my second choice and maybe run both this and Vmplayer 3.
Then maybe qemu with kqemu.
Dunno how to get xen working on a preloaded W7 install.
Except that the EULA says you're not allowed, or was that only Vista? Heck I was trying to google it and came up with answers ranging from yes, no, one vm, up to 4 vms. Anyone have a copy of the Windows 7 Eula? Doesn't it say something to the effect that it's supposed to be the only OS on the machine? Looking for a straight answer..
Last edited by mostlyharmless; 11-18-2009 at 04:43 PM.
In terms of rank:
1. XEN
2. VirtualBox
3. VMWare Desktop
By what characteristic(s) are these ranked? Performance? Ease-of-use? Features? Security? Maintainability? Stability? Documentation?
Usually there is no outright "best-of-breed" software, only "horses for courses" and the response to "Which is the best ***?" is not an answer but further questions: "What do you want to use it for?", "What are you areas and levels of expertise?", "What environment are you using?" etc.
Perhaps we can evolve a matrix listing the various virtualisation products against their particular strengths and weaknesses. Few of us have in-depth experience of more than one product so it may not be easy. For example all I know is that VirtualBox has more ease-of-use and better documentation than KVM (I gave up trying to set up KVM).
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.