LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 03-30-2007, 05:34 PM   #1
ricardisimo
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Earth
Distribution: Ubuntu 9.04
Posts: 15

Rep: Reputation: 0
XMMS not dead?


Just the other day, I saw in my Update Manager (Ubuntu - Feisty) an upgrade for XMMS, which was a pleasant surprise. I thought the project was defunct; pushed aside in favor of Beep and Audacious. Anyone know the details here? I'd love to see it revived.

Someone in another forum said Beep was the same thing, but with a few extra bells and whistles, but I'm not yet convinced. Might just be a skin thing for me, I guess. I'm soooo superficial.
 
Old 03-31-2007, 12:03 AM   #2
Xian
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: 33.31N -111.97W
Distribution: SuSE
Posts: 918

Rep: Reputation: 31
Was it for a bug fix or new features?
 
Old 03-31-2007, 04:19 PM   #3
ricardisimo
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Earth
Distribution: Ubuntu 9.04
Posts: 15

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
XMMS not dead?

I think it was a compatibility update for Feisty Fawn, but still... isn't the project dead?
 
Old 04-01-2007, 09:09 AM   #4
David the H.
Bash Guru
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Osaka, Japan
Distribution: Debian sid + kde 3.5 & 4.4
Posts: 6,823

Rep: Reputation: 1950Reputation: 1950Reputation: 1950Reputation: 1950Reputation: 1950Reputation: 1950Reputation: 1950Reputation: 1950Reputation: 1950Reputation: 1950Reputation: 1950
The updates aren't part of the original project, but are created by the people in charge of packaging them up for the distributions. They don't mean that the project is active, just that it's still popular enough for packaging and bugfix updates to continue. I've seen similar things in Debian.

But in any case, I've been using Audacious for months now, and it's great. There's really little difference between it and xmms on the outside, but it has a much nicer gtk2 file browser and configuration panel underneath. The only problem I've had is that the plugin interface has changed, so old xmms plugins may be unavailable or need updating before they can work with it. You can get some updated plugins from the Audacious page and forum, but you may have to compile them yourself.

Audacious is actually a fork of Beep, so the two are very similar, but the Beep developers have abandoned it now also in favor of a completely new design, which is the reason for the fork. So if you want an xmms that's actively being developed, Audacious is the project you want.

he Wikipedia pages on the two projects will give you a good, simple rundown, if you're interested.
 
Old 04-01-2007, 09:14 PM   #5
ciotog
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slackware current
Posts: 728
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 43
I've enjoyed Audacious for the last few weeks as well, except for a few things. The CPU usage is quite a bit higher than with XMMS (5-10% load on my Athlon XP 2500+), and it doesn't know how to sort properly at all. The OSD is nice, but I wish it could tell volume changes outside of Audacious.
 
Old 04-06-2007, 12:19 PM   #6
kramed
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Peterborough, Ontario, Canada
Distribution: Fedora 8
Posts: 36

Rep: Reputation: 15
New version of Audacious came out today, supposed to fix most of the bugs from the 1.3 branch. I have been using audacious since I discovered it, not problems at all. Looks smoking with Winamp skins too.
 
Old 04-06-2007, 12:32 PM   #7
rickh
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM USA
Distribution: Debian-Lenny/Sid 32/64 Desktop: Generic AMD64-EVGA 680i Laptop: Generic Intel SIS-AC97
Posts: 4,250

Rep: Reputation: 60
My only problems with Audacious as compared to xmms are:

It takes a lot longer to load my 5000+ mp3s.
It occasionally "skips" on files that xmms plays perfectly.
 
Old 04-06-2007, 12:39 PM   #8
Emerson
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Saint Amant, Acadiana
Distribution: Gentoo ~
Posts: 3,177

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
It takes a lot longer to load my 5000+ mp3s.

Maybe you should rethink the way you manage them.
 
  


Reply

Tags
xmms


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Symptoms of a Dead MOBO vs a Dead Processor..... Delano_Lucas General 7 07-26-2006 05:50 PM
Xinetd dead --xinetd dead but pid file exists hillxy Linux - General 1 04-15-2004 03:10 PM
ghost-xmms: alive, but dead? b0uncer Linux - Software 5 01-04-2004 08:36 AM
Dead Display = Dead Machine chris319 Linux - Hardware 1 12-05-2003 07:37 AM
Squid:2nd Browser access Internet SPEED dead becomes dead slow mwj Linux - Software 1 10-04-2003 02:40 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:29 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration