[SOLVED] X.Org X Server 220.127.116.111 + Radeon 9200 + driver radeon - low performance
Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
X.Org X Server 18.104.22.1681 + Radeon 9200 + driver radeon - low performance
recently I found, X.org is not idiot-proof. Today I have booted up and my PC was almost useless. X server took around 80% of CPU usage. Suitable solution was to remove xcompmgr - X server is in normal with CPU, but eats a lot of memory (understand - more than usual). And also performance in glxgears is much lower (8-9x).
I'm using X.org 22.214.171.1241, graphic card ATI Radeon 9200 with "radeon" driver. My WM is Openbox (current version from Arch repository).
Some info from log:
[michal@arch-linux ~]$ cat /var/log/Xorg.0.log |grep EE
(EE) Failed to load module "record" (module does not exist, 0)
(EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIGetVersion failed because of a version mismatch.
[michal@arch-linux ~]$ cat /var/log/Xorg.0.log |grep WW
(WW) AllowEmptyInput is on, devices using drivers 'kbd', 'mouse' or 'vmmouse' will be disabled.
(WW) Disabling Mouse0
(WW) Disabling Keyboard0
(WW) Open ACPI failed (/var/run/acpid.socket) (No such file or directory)
(WW) Warning, couldn't open module record
(WW) VGA arbiter: cannot open kernel arbiter, no multi-card support
(WW) RADEON(0): Direct rendering disabled
And my xorg.conf - section Device (I think the most useful)
Well apparently Xorg isn't even working at all. You don't appear to have the radeon driver installed. It's probably in a package called something like xf86-video-ati. Can you try (re)installing it and starting X again?
Looks to me like you have KMS enabled in the kernel? If that's the case, you need to build libdrm with support for KMS (via the --enable-radeon-experimental-api option) and then rebuild xf86-video-ati and, possibly, Mesa.
Alternatively, you could reboot with the radeon.modeset=0 option to the kernel (disabling KMS) and see if direct rendering then works.
I think it's not a solution. Yesterday and days before was everything ok. My FPS was around 900 (after I installed xf86-video-ati - as you had advised me). Do you think the xorg.conf will told us something more? (In this case - here it is: http://kvaky.net/nahrano/xorg.conf)
And direct rendering - X.org probably tells something else, than glxinfo, see.
[michal@arch-linux ~]$ glxinfo |grep render
direct rendering: Yes
EDIT: And where can I find, what I have enabled in kernel?
Last edited by MichalKvacek; 12-23-2009 at 10:53 AM.
Adam, you are really such a great wizard! Again, you have solved my problem. Thank you a lot.
Btw. radeon.modeset=0 changed only the size of letters in console (during boot and after pressing ctrl + alt + fx). The second option (nomodeset) was correct - my actual FPS is around 1500. I can't belive... ) Thank you.