Wordperfect versus LibreOffice for Linux?
Hello,
I would like to ask you which one do you prefer wp or libreoffice? http://www.wpuniverse.com/vb/showthr...r-Ubuntu-10.04 https://wiki.ubuntuusers.de/LibreOffice/ Best regards |
You have an obsession with obsolete stuff. The last Linux version of Wordperfect was released in 2004...
|
Quote:
WP: It is true for Linux, quite outdated. You can run Wine on the last Wordperfect, quite slow. Libreoffice is really slow, quite same result. Latex is probably the king of word processing on Linux. |
Back in the day, as the hip young things say, I really like WordPerfect, because its logic was linear, just like my thought process. But WP is as dead as a Commodore.
|
I'd say LO 5.x isn't anywhere near as slow as 4.x was. While still not BLAZINGLY fast, it's now at least what I'd call acceptable.
|
I went back to OpenOffice after LO 4. Try it! I think the Apache people are doing better than L/O. the OO Gui is super intuitive with some new flyout menus that I really like. I feel it's a bit faster, too.
I haven't tried LO 5 which may be faster. I don't need to. I really like openoffice and I'm staying there |
I too stuck with OpenOffice. It works and I'm used to it: that's enough reason for me.
PS Latex is not a word processor. Some of my writing is published (always by those who don't accept Latex!) but most of my files are my own notes. The formating is there to make them clear for me: I don't want to read plain text, let alone text full of mark-up. |
Please forgive the slight veer to address LatEx. As mentioned, it's not a word processor. it's a typesetter (formats pages not lines)
That said, in certain applications, it can't be beat. For anything longer than about 500 words I don't use word processors. If interested, try Lyx, which is a great front end for LatEx docs. |
I didn't know WP made a Linux version ~
Just googled it Quote:
|
LOL! Nobody ever used WordPerfect by choice.
|
Quote:
Back in the day I did use it; one of the reasons was that (unlike the *other* big DOS word processor) it didn't mangle your formatting when you switched to another printer ... the current windows version of the *other* one still sucks at that to date. That all said: "LaTeX ;} baby!" |
mickeysoft made a $135 Million Canadian "investment" in Corel and shortly thereafter Corel Linux and WordPerfect for Linux disappeared without so much as a whisper.
Edit in: A link to one of the news story. http://www.forbes.com/2000/10/03/1003corel.html Quote:
|
I quite like LO and think the LO team has done a wonderful job in updating the system over the kludge that was OOo. I don't have to use office suites nearly so much as I used to, but LO has done everything I've asked of it and done it quite nicely (mostly these days I use Calc).
Quote:
|
Quote:
Used it for work in the bad old DOS days (employer gave us a choice of WordPerfect or MS Word). The transition to MS Windows narrowed the gap but WP was still more usable. Did I mention the "reveal codes" feature? LO and OO could really take a leaf out of that book. Eventually it became obvious WP wasn't going anywhere useful so I turned to Star Office, which later gave us LO/OO. Hence my vote for Libre Office. |
Quote:
I just opened it up and well I don't use it much but but they do not have it in ab easy place to find where page numbers is. because I can't find it LoL IMOP LibreOffice cannot even number the pages and its been around for how long? ver 5xxx |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:27 AM. |