LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-10-2008, 11:06 AM   #16
BallsOfSteel
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Florida
Distribution: Fedora mainly, but I am open to others.
Posts: 273

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 34

Great... now I'm getting this error after installing Wireshark from a tar.gz
Code:
Can't get pathname of Wireshark: "wireshark" not found in "/usr/bin:/bin".
It won't be possible to capture traffic.
Report this to the Wireshark developers.
Any idea how to remove something after doing a ./configure, make, make install?
 
Old 07-10-2008, 11:58 AM   #17
Hangdog42
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,803
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 422Reputation: 422Reputation: 422Reputation: 422Reputation: 422
Quote:
Any idea how to check what firmware version of it I'm using? I'm using Fedora 9, 2.6.25.9-76.
Have a look in /lib/firmware, the file name has the version number as part of it.

Quote:
Any idea how to remove something after doing a ./configure, make, make install?
Try make uninstall. Hopefully that will do the trick. By the way, if you install from source, you might have a look at the checkinstall program. It can create RPM files that make life easier. It replaces the make install step.

Quote:
Well, I can load the ipwraw module for my card, load up Wireshark and run it in promiscuous mode without any problems. Running it with the iwl3945 module makes it crash.
To be honest, I'm really starting to believe that Fedora has patched something somewhere to cause this. I never have to touch the ipraw module for anything (although to be honest, wireshark is the only program I use that need promiscuous mode). Without any error messages, I'm just taking random shots and that probably isn't going to help much. What we probably need is someone MUCH more familiar with Fedora than I am. You might ask the mods to move this thread to the Fedora forum or ask on a different forum dedicated to Fedora.
 
Old 07-10-2008, 12:17 PM   #18
BallsOfSteel
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Florida
Distribution: Fedora mainly, but I am open to others.
Posts: 273

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 34
sudo make uninstall worked. Now I know! I have tried posting in Fedoraforum.org, no response whatsoever.

As far as the firmware version... I'm not seeing anything close to iwl3945.fw. The only thing that I can find is a iwl3945.ucode and iwl3945-1.ucode. This is strange.

I'll try a different distro, maybe an Ubuntu live CD and see if it works. I'll do that tonight and post my results.
 
Old 07-10-2008, 12:31 PM   #19
Hangdog42
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,803
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 422Reputation: 422Reputation: 422Reputation: 422Reputation: 422
Quote:
sudo make uninstall worked. Now I know!
The problem is you can't count on make uninstall because a LOT of source packages don't have it. That is what really got me using checkinstall (until it broke on Slackware and was more than replaced by src2pkg).
Quote:
As far as the firmware version... I'm not seeing anything close to iwl3945.fw. The only thing that I can find is a iwl3945.ucode and iwl3945-1.ucode. This is strange.
It's possible Fedora renamed it. However, this is a binary blob that nobody can alter, so you could get the newest firmware from the intel wireless site, put it in /lib/firmware and see if that helps. I would back up the existing firmware files just in case you need to roll back and you'll probably have to have only one set of iwl3945 firmware files in /lib/firmware.

Quote:
I'll try a different distro, maybe an Ubuntu live CD and see if it works. I'll do that tonight and post my results.
That wouldn't be a bad idea. When it comes to wireless, Fedora is a notable standout in the Linux world, and not in a good way.
 
Old 07-11-2008, 01:08 PM   #20
BallsOfSteel
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Florida
Distribution: Fedora mainly, but I am open to others.
Posts: 273

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 34
Just an update... Ubuntu 8.04 doesn't seem to want to connect to any networks on the Live CD. Need more time, I'll post back later.
 
Old 07-12-2008, 11:49 AM   #21
BallsOfSteel
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Florida
Distribution: Fedora mainly, but I am open to others.
Posts: 273

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 34
Well... I feel awfully f*cking stupid. I was trying to run Wireshark as sudo, not root, and it would crash. Running it as root (su) appears to have fixed the problem.

However, once running, it's impossible to browse websites, but it does intercept most of the packets it seems. It is a little... jumpy, glitchy... use whatever word you want. Is this normal? Just a side effect of the 3945 driver?
 
Old 07-12-2008, 06:41 PM   #22
Hangdog42
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,803
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 422Reputation: 422Reputation: 422Reputation: 422Reputation: 422
Quote:
Well... I feel awfully f*cking stupid. I was trying to run Wireshark as sudo, not root, and it would crash. Running it as root (su) appears to have fixed the problem.

That's odd. I mean I do occasionally see a difference between su and sudo, but I use sudo all the time to run wireshark. I'm guessing there is some path or permissions differences between sudo and su that are the cause. Nice pick-up on your part because I wouldn't have guessed this one.

Quote:
However, once running, it's impossible to browse websites, but it does intercept most of the packets it seems. It is a little... jumpy, glitchy... use whatever word you want. Is this normal? Just a side effect of the 3945 driver?
It isn't a side effect of the driver, at least if my rig is any indication. I can run wireshark and browse without any problems. In fact promiscuous mode shouldn't prevent any traffic, otherwise tools like Snort wouldn't be usable. Again, I'm going to guess it is something about the way Fedora handles the driver. It seems to behave differently on your machine than it does on mine.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why won't the wlan0 interface appear in Ubuntu Linux? Ironballz Linux - Wireless Networking 1 02-08-2007 04:14 AM
ndiswrapper vaild, no interface with wlan0 VampireL0rd Linux - Wireless Networking 1 02-04-2007 11:18 AM
wlan0 interface has no transmit power ??? nosredna Linux - Wireless Networking 2 07-25-2006 07:52 PM
Strange interface wlan0 eduardomsilva Linux - Wireless Networking 8 02-17-2005 09:52 AM
About the wlan0 interface and driver problem paranoia1980 Linux - Wireless Networking 73 03-08-2004 04:38 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:48 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration