LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Complete CCNA, CCNP & Red Hat Certification Training Bundle
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-02-2003, 04:44 AM   #16
Calum
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: London
Distribution: Red Hat 9
Posts: 302

Rep: Reputation: 30

well i have been using the phoenix (now called firebird) browser since version 0.1 and i have to say it is excellent. it does all that a browser should without coming packaged with all the cruft (email clients, chat clients, programs to keep track of how many socks you have, programs to organise reminder notes to self et c) and is therefore great. apparently the mozilla project plans to work firebird up to full mozilla browser capability and then replace the existing mozilla line with firebird, which will kick ass. first though they are putting together a software suite containing all the crufty bits that they will be leaving out, for those people who like that sort of thing...

in short, i recommend phoenix (<ahem> sorry, 'firebird').
 
Old 05-02-2003, 10:19 AM   #17
romcgill
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: New Zealand
Distribution: Windows 95, Lycoris desktopLX
Posts: 112

Rep: Reputation: 15
The browser question is fraught with agreement, disagreement, and plain dissension!

I've tried to find out (via these forums) what is a "good" browser for Linux and have had many different opinions.

I personally like Opera, but have been told it has/causes problems by one person, and is great by others.

As above - Linux is about choice, and after MS this can be difficult. I am trying different ones at the moment. So far I like Opera mostly, but there does some to be some niggles, like not all tabs showing _ but then again, it might be me not using it properly.

I ran a thread on browsers and phoenix came through as a preference of those who responded - I wanted something reasonably small and fast. It does seem to be those things but I am still having problems getting it to run without having to run using ./ in a terminal. So I am back to Opera.

Good luck. One thing I have found - there's heaps of help - but at the end of the day you have to make a decision sometimes. Scary after Windows! But then, if you couldn't make a decision after Windows you wouldn't be here ...

Cheers
Rose
 
Old 05-02-2003, 12:59 PM   #18
Mega Man X
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: ~
Distribution: Ubuntu, FreeBSD, Solaris, DSL
Posts: 5,339

Rep: Reputation: 64
I use Mozilla in my Mandrake 9.0 and also Mozilla, instead of IE, when I have to boot with WinXP (I like it much more then IE, nice browser, short cuts, mail, popup block and above all else, it's not M$ ). There's a huge diference between the very same version of Mozilla, running into two diferents OS. I believe ( this is just a guess ) that it is not the browser problem in Linux, but it's how Linux "render"(Images, fonts, flash app...) things diferently from M$ OS...
I don't think it's bad if Linux render things diferently, but it takes time to get used with as Linux itselfs .
 
Old 05-02-2003, 01:16 PM   #19
twk
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Canada
Distribution: Fedora/RHEL
Posts: 152

Rep: Reputation: 31
Mozilla,phoenix(firebird..whatever their new name is), galeon
 
Old 05-02-2003, 01:30 PM   #20
Calum
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: London
Distribution: Red Hat 9
Posts: 302

Rep: Reputation: 30
romcgill, that's odd, as i say i have used phoenix since 0.1 and have never had any problem with it. i just untar it into /opt and then do "ln -s /opt/phoenix/phoenix /usr/bin/phoenix" which then enables me to just make a desktop icons pointing to "phoenix" or just type "phoenix" in a runbox...
 
Old 05-02-2003, 01:54 PM   #21
gnu4world
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: India
Distribution: Redhat 8.0
Posts: 8

Rep: Reputation: 0
surely mozilla.get mozilla 1.4 from mozilla.org
 
Old 05-02-2003, 08:41 PM   #22
yowwww
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 533

Rep: Reputation: 30
mozilla 1.3 and up get my vote
 
Old 05-02-2003, 08:49 PM   #23
tied2
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2002
Location: Florida
Distribution: Redhat, FreeBSD, FC 6
Posts: 220

Rep: Reputation: 30
Opera rocks! it's a pain at first but after you get it dialed in it can just do so much! I love the right click features, and it is by far the fastest! the only thing with Opera is it's doesn't do java well. Look around and you can find a way to register it.

Last edited by tied2; 05-02-2003 at 08:52 PM.
 
Old 05-02-2003, 11:49 PM   #24
burk
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2001
Posts: 23

Rep: Reputation: 15
I really like Opera, use it in Linux and Windows as my main web browser. Just downloaded Phoenix/Firebird and I'm really impressed. If Opera's faster I can't tell the difference. It really is a matter of personal preference so try several. I can't say that I've had any problems getting pages to display correctly with any of the browsers. Allthough as tied2 said getting Opera set up and all the plugins installed can be a headache.
 
Old 05-03-2003, 12:36 AM   #25
Timothy Miller
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Arizona, USA
Distribution: Debian & Fedora mostly
Posts: 2,034

Rep: Reputation: 540Reputation: 540Reputation: 540Reputation: 540Reputation: 540Reputation: 540
I like Opera and Firebird.
Opera is my #1 choice, but I had gotten into using Firebird while waiting for Opera 7. If you try opera, get the 7.1beta, don't use the old stable 6.12, it sucks (in my opionion, which is, of course, the most important opionion to me). I've found with Opera 7, there are any longer VERY few websites that don't display properly in it. Less, in fact, than there are with Firebird 0.5 (nightly build from sometime in the middle of april).
 
Old 05-03-2003, 01:46 AM   #26
bulliver
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Edmonton AB, Canada
Distribution: Gentoo x86_64; Gentoo PPC; FreeBSD; OS X 10.9.4
Posts: 3,760
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 78
Konqueror will display standard compliant xhtml and css properly.
Mozilla does as well, but I can't get the fonts to look nice, and I find it takes too long to load.
I don't use Opera because I stopped using M$ to get away from adware, and I can't justify spending money on it when the free software installed on my system do the job perfectly.

So, I use Konq, but as with all of these "which is the best" threads, the only answer is to try them all and judge for yourself else deal with a thousand personal opinions and be more confused than ever.
 
Old 05-03-2003, 02:32 AM   #27
soothsayer
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Tampabay Area
Distribution: redhat 6.2-9
Posts: 33

Rep: Reputation: 15
Opera is one of my favorites, Konqueror is good too... Just make sure you load flash and such...
 
Old 05-04-2003, 11:58 AM   #28
Calum
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: London
Distribution: Red Hat 9
Posts: 302

Rep: Reputation: 30
opera is still closed source nagware though.

might i just put in another mention here, i started using epiphany recently and i prefer it in many ways to any of the other gecko browsers (moz, galeon, netscape, phoenix et c) epiphany is most similar to galeon, for those that have used it.

Epiphany requires that you have a version of mozilla that has been compiled against GTK+ 2 though, and i think the norm is to compile it against GTK+ 1 (i might be wrong, but that's how the mozilla that comes with slack 9 is built).

it's good though, nice minimal interface, fast and functional.

http://epiphany.mozdev.org/
 
Old 05-08-2003, 02:12 AM   #29
romcgill
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: New Zealand
Distribution: Windows 95, Lycoris desktopLX
Posts: 112

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally posted by Calum
romcgill, that's odd, as i say i have used phoenix since 0.1 and have never had any problem with it. i just untar it into /opt and then do "ln -s /opt/phoenix/phoenix /usr/bin/phoenix" which then enables me to just make a desktop icons pointing to "phoenix" or just type "phoenix" in a runbox...
Calum is the command to untar into /opt something like?

tar -xzvf phoenix-0.5-i686-pc-linux-gnu.tar.gz -C /opt

The phoenix above is what downloaded.

Thanks
Rose
 
Old 05-08-2003, 04:19 AM   #30
Calum
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: London
Distribution: Red Hat 9
Posts: 302

Rep: Reputation: 30
yes, although i am not sure what that -C is doing there, to make it even simpler i would probably "mv phoenix.....tar.gz /opt" then "cd /opt" and then "tar -xvzf phoenix...tar.gz" (the ... isn't literal, i wouldn't type that if i were actually entering in the commands, just there's no tab completion on a bulletin board!) then i would just make a symlink in /usr/bin or possibly /usr/local/bin using "ln -s".
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to Change Default Browser to a new browser banner Linux - General 1 05-14-2005 12:09 AM
browser plugin for Konqueror web browser (linspire) Tracianddwayne Linux - Newbie 1 01-01-2005 03:15 PM
A Question on Browser Sessions, and Browser Windows: opioid Programming 1 09-23-2004 03:53 PM
gaim browser / default browser question hildog Linux - Newbie 2 10-03-2003 10:17 AM
Best Browser Phonics3k Linux - Software 2 06-23-2002 01:25 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:52 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration