What programs would you like to see ported to Linux?
Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
The whole things about FSTab and file systems is confusing.
What would be wrong with just having drive C: D: E: etc..?
it's confusing at first but the idea of mounting into directory structures rather than drive letters makes a great deal more sense when you start getting into the thick of system administration.
however, if it's a linux equivelent of windows'"my computer" then there are options out there. KDE does a lot of this in it's default build (see the 'systems' screen via the link on your desktop.
also, smb4k is a rather handy samba/windows file and printer sharing browser.
i'm sure there are even programs out there to take the pain away from editing fstab, though i've never looked into it myself.
keep with it though - it's a great tool to mount just everything from CD ISO images to network shares.
indeed. sometimes i wonder if people bother looking before posting on here
I think alot of people just assume that a program is not available for linux. There are alot of people who think they "need" a program, when there are OSS programs that do the exact same thing
netscape is dead and Thunderbird can do pretty much the exact same thing
I haven't gotten around to installing it yet, but is Thunderbird really much different from Icedove, Netscape 6, and aside from security issues, Outlook? I tried Icedove and it is a peice of junk compared to what I have used the last 10 years. I am not sure the Linux community ''gets'' easy to use.
Edit
I just found this quote at wwwtechsoup.org, ''The same is true of Thunderbird and Outlook: going back and forth is pretty seamless.'' NS 4.X was quite different from Outlook. If I liked Outlook, I would use it.
I haven't gotten around to installing it yet, but is Thunderbird really much different from Icedove, Netscape 6, and aside from security issues, Outlook? I tried Icedove and it is a peice of junk compared to what I have used the last 10 years. I am not sure the Linux community ''gets'' easy to use.
Read the first line of my sig. Just because it isn't easy to use for you, doesn't mean it isn't easy to use for anyone else
I haven't gotten around to installing it yet, but is Thunderbird really much different from Icedove, Netscape 6, and aside from security issues, Outlook? I tried Icedove and it is a peice of junk compared to what I have used the last 10 years. I am not sure the Linux community ''gets'' easy to use.
Edit
I just found this quote at wwwtechsoup.org, ''The same is true of Thunderbird and Outlook: going back and forth is pretty seamless.'' NS 4.X was quite different from Outlook. If I liked Outlook, I would use it.
I have a life outside playing with my computer. Clicking on the install button as the instructions said didn't work, and figuring out what to do next hasn't been my top priority.
I have a life outside playing with my computer. Clicking on the install button as the instructions said didn't work, and figuring out what to do next hasn't been my top priority.
You don't install software from your package manager?
I have a life outside playing with my computer. Clicking on the install button as the instructions said didn't work, and figuring out what to do next hasn't been my top priority.
it takes 2 seconds to download and install using your package manager of choice. You wont even have visit Mozilla's website. The whole process would take less time than in Windows!
Surely even you can make time for that? If not, then don't come moaning about wanting x software for Linux
[edit] oops - didn't spot someone else has suggested you use your package manager
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.