Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
11-09-2007, 10:56 PM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2007
Location: Nanaimo
Distribution: Red Hat 5
Posts: 39
Rep:
|
What is better than Mutt?
Hey Everyone,
Is there a better program out there than Mutt for command line mail reading etc? I know of Pine, can you guys think of any others that might be worth a try for a terminal mail manipulator?
Cheers,
Brent.
|
|
|
|
11-10-2007, 01:10 AM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2007
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 337
Rep:
|
Mutt > * IMO, "*" including GUI e-mail clients.
|
|
|
|
11-10-2007, 11:42 AM
|
#3
|
|
HCL Maintainer
Registered: Jan 2006
Distribution: (H)LFS, Gentoo
Posts: 2,450
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by leebrent
Is there a better program out there than Mutt for command line mail reading etc?
|
No (but that’s just my opinion).
|
|
|
|
11-10-2007, 11:46 AM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Distribution: Kubuntu 12.10 (using awesome wm though)
Posts: 3,530
Rep:
|
Better based on what criteria?
|
|
|
|
11-11-2007, 11:24 AM
|
#5
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2007
Location: Nanaimo
Distribution: Red Hat 5
Posts: 39
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by matthewg42
Better based on what criteria?
|
Ease of use in the terminal.
|
|
|
|
11-11-2007, 11:38 AM
|
#6
|
|
HCL Maintainer
Registered: Jan 2006
Distribution: (H)LFS, Gentoo
Posts: 2,450
Rep:
|
If you’re going to have such a broad criterion, why don’t you try a bunch of them and decide for yourself.
|
|
|
|
11-11-2007, 02:10 PM
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Distribution: Kubuntu 12.10 (using awesome wm though)
Posts: 3,530
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by leebrent
Ease of use in the terminal.
|
In that case, try anything except mutt
Mutt is very capable (so I am led to believe), but it's a bit of a pig to learn. The "selling point" which has been offered to me is that if you do a lot of email processing, and you can ride the learning curve to muscle memory, mutt is very fast and efficient to use. I never heard anyone saying it is use friendly.
In the past I've used pine, mailx, and I emacs in terminals (start emacs with the -nw option to use the curses interface). I only used pine for any length of time, because I used it at college back in the days when GUI based mail clients were considered the height of bad taste. It was OK back then, but I don't know how much I'd enjoy using it these days.
|
|
|
|
11-11-2007, 04:00 PM
|
#8
|
|
Moderator
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 42,706
|
mutt is sweet, cone was also nice when i used that for a while, but not as good, and as i originally learnt pine / pico, trasferring to mutt / vi about 3 years later was a revelation. what i did like was mutt-ng, which had a lot of patches, a sidebar to provide a real standard 3 pane layout (yes yes, a la outlook but sod it...), another patch i liked was a header download patch to allow advanced download of email and such, all 1very comfortable whilst keeping the speed of vi and all.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:50 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|