LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   Linux - Software (http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-software-2/)
-   -   Weird behaviour of mdadm/software RAID5 (http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-software-2/weird-behaviour-of-mdadm-software-raid5-525101/)

robbe751 02-02-2007 07:53 PM

Weird behaviour of mdadm/software RAID5
 
Hi,

I have a setup like the following:
-3xSATA Seagate 400GB (same drives) on an ASUS M2NPV-VM
-/dev/sd[a|b|c] are members of the RAID5 /dev/md0

The status of /dev/md0 is clean, persistent sb etc.

Now I noticed that /dev/sda has no partition on it. /dev/sdb and sdc have an 'fd' autodetect partition on them. This is weird already.
So I go ahead and remove sda from the array, zero the superblocks and for good measure do a

sudo dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda count=1M

Now I partition sda properly with sda1 as 'fd' autodetect. When I now

sudo mdadm /dev/md0 --add /dev/sda1

I only get

mdadm: add new device failed for /dev/sda1 as 3: Invalid argument

The funny thing is, when I --add /dev/sda instead, it works and starts rebuilding the array. Why do I have to add the whole disk, rather than the partition? This doesn't make sense to me.

Any hints or directions?

-Jan.

macemoneta 02-03-2007 02:08 PM

Make sure your /etc/mdadm.conf (or /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf) contains the partition you are adding in the DEVICE statement.

dgar 02-03-2007 11:32 PM

I never use /etc/mdadm.conf

I set up a replacement disk with the following:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda
sfdisk -d /dev/sdb | tee sdb.sfdisk
sfdisk /dev/sda < sdb.sfdisk
mdadm /dev/md0 --add /dev/sda1

That is if you are using partitions instead of the whole drive for the array...
Compare 'mdadm -E /dev/sdb' output to 'mdadm -E /dev/sdb1' and 'mdadm -E /dev/sda1'


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:33 AM.