Webmail interface for POP3 mail.. Has it been done?
Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
I think squirrelmail is not for standard unix mailboxes, it requires IMAP (but I may be wrong).
I myself use neomail for webmail, based on standard unix mailboxes (POP3).
Neomail is great as it is, however, its development has been stopped (no new versions, only patches will ever be issued).
I think there is new, living webmail project based on the original neomail sources, which is called Open Webmail (if I remember correctly). You may google search for that.
don't know about the error (i'm sure someone else will post about it soon, though) but here's the link to the open web mail based on neomail 1.4 that J_Szucs mentioned... it looks like it's very actively maintained (look at the change log)...
NEOMAIL ERROR Couldn't get write lock on /var/spool/mail//sedulous
I never got the same error, though I think it may be related to permissions on the /var/spool/mail directory.
Mine is world writable, but even so I had to install Neomail with the su option (read the doc).
I know these can result in security risk, so I only make webmail accessible through https, with client and server authentication in the background. There are security certificates installed on the server and the clients, too.
In general, I found it the most convenient to simply put stunnel over normal services and so to have the secure service. Say you have http on port 80, use stunnel to connect port 80 to 443 and voila: you have https on port 443. The same applies to pop3: connect port 110 to 995 via stunnel, and you have secure pop3 on port 995, etc.
This way you only have to configure stunnel (leaving apache, qpopper, etc. untouched), and you can use the same security certificates for all services (at least when you access these services via the same URL like me).
These secure services then can be forwarded to the corresponding ports on the firewall.
Neomail asks quuestions during installation. I think it is among those questions ('location of mail spool' or something like that).
If you are unsure, you could post all of the questions and your answers to them (naturally hiding your real mail address).
You should also post where your mailboxes are (/var/mail? /var/spool/mail?)
Please also note that there are no such thing like "pop3 mailboxes".
There are standard unix mailboxes that a pop3 server makes accessible. So does neomail, which uses the same standard unix mailboxes. That is why these are so easy to use.