Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
09-21-2012, 06:07 PM
|
#1
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2012
Distribution: linux CentOS
Posts: 7
Rep: 
|
UNetbootin not working on fedora 17
Hello
I downloaded UNetbootin from official site here:
http://unetbootin.sourceforge.net/un...n-linux-latest
It's a binary (according to firefox download) I made it executable and _it won't run_ I tried chmod +x ..I tried clicking and ./ nothing.
uname -a:
Is it not compatible with my system?
yes I will try (yum install) but I just want to know why this binary is not working
Thanks..
EDIT: hmmm yum install shows dependencies..
Quote:
Installing for dependencies:
libmng x86_64 1.0.10-6.fc17 fedora 166 k
p7zip-plugins x86_64 9.20.1-3.fc17 fedora 871 k
qt x86_64 1:4.8.2-4.fc17 updates 4.3 M
qt-settings noarch 4.8-19.fc17 updates 26 k
qt-x11 x86_64 1:4.8.2-4.fc17 updates 12 M
syslinux-extlinux x86_64 4.05-1.fc17 fedora 355 k
|
So I guess it's solved 
Last edited by iphg93; 09-21-2012 at 06:19 PM.
|
|
|
|
10-09-2012, 08:01 AM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2006
Distribution: Mepis and Fedora, also Mandrake and SuSE PC-BSD Mint Solaris 11 express
Posts: 340
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by iphg93
Hello
I downloaded UNetbootin from official site here:
http://unetbootin.sourceforge.net/un...n-linux-latest
It's a binary (according to firefox download) I made it executable and _it won't run_ I tried chmod +x ..I tried clicking and ./ nothing.
uname -a:
Is it not compatible with my system?
yes I will try (yum install) but I just want to know why this binary is not working
Thanks..
EDIT: hmmm yum install shows dependencies..
So I guess it's solved 
|
That's good, but the only way to know for sure is to use unetbootin to make an actual bootable USB drive that works. Do be aware that unetbootin can only make linux working USB drives. It thinks it can do bsd, Solaris, pcbsd and so on but the resulting drives don't work. Unetbootin is linux only.
If it won't work, there is a command line utility called dd that can do everything unetbootin does and more. Just make sure you don't hose the wrong drive by mistake. dd=disk destroyer
|
|
|
|
10-09-2012, 08:36 AM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jun 2002
Location: Eastern PA, USA
Distribution: K/Ubuntu 10.04/12.04, Scientific Linux 6.3, Android-x86, Maemo
Posts: 1,658
Rep: 
|
Note that there are different types of images, as well. "Hybrid" images allow you to use standard tools to prepare a boot medium (burning an ISO to CD or DVD), or they may be used to simply dd an image to a USB with a simple command line. Not all image files have this capability,... that's where unetbootin comes in...
Personally, unetbootin has always been a problem for me, and my hardware. Your mileage may vary...
|
|
|
|
10-09-2012, 09:42 AM
|
#4
|
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2006
Distribution: Mepis and Fedora, also Mandrake and SuSE PC-BSD Mint Solaris 11 express
Posts: 340
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JaseP
Note that there are different types of images, as well. "Hybrid" images allow you to use standard tools to prepare a boot medium (burning an ISO to CD or DVD), or they may be used to simply dd an image to a USB with a simple command line. Not all image files have this capability,... that's where unetbootin comes in...
Personally, unetbootin has always been a problem for me, and my hardware. Your mileage may vary...
|
That's what k3b is for. Heck, if you use dvd-rw it will burn slower but you'll save $$ on physical media. It's the stacks of dvds that motivates one to use unetbootin in the first place.
If you download the .img files you can always use dd instead. I think that dd is already built in the terminal.
|
|
|
|
10-09-2012, 02:55 PM
|
#5
|
|
Guru
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,556
|
The link you posted seems to be to a windows .exe file.
See pendrivelinux.com for some ideas. Each distro also has ideas on how to make a flash install.
I make them in a virtual machine. I use a usb flash just as if it were a real hard drive on the installer. All newish distro's will load that way. Only some older type or made for older hardware kernels fail but there are ways around that too.
|
|
|
|
10-09-2012, 04:06 PM
|
#6
|
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2006
Distribution: Mepis and Fedora, also Mandrake and SuSE PC-BSD Mint Solaris 11 express
Posts: 340
Rep:
|
booting
If the computer's bios will boot from USB, it should work. If its some antique distro like Mandrake 9, maybe not.
Still, if you're using something that old, just burn it to a CD and be happy. K3b is your friend.
I would recommend using something current even if you have an old machine. A newer spin of puppy will give you fewer headaches then redhat 7 or something really old.
With hardware, I'd go for something 5 years old or less. PCs are dropping in price all the time.
|
|
|
|
10-09-2012, 04:08 PM
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jun 2002
Location: Eastern PA, USA
Distribution: K/Ubuntu 10.04/12.04, Scientific Linux 6.3, Android-x86, Maemo
Posts: 1,658
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdlinuxwolf
That's what k3b is for. Heck, if you use dvd-rw it will burn slower but you'll save $$ on physical media. It's the stacks of dvds that motivates one to use unetbootin in the first place.
If you download the .img files you can always use dd instead. I think that dd is already built in the terminal.
|
Not everyone uses K3B,... I wasn't talking about *.img files. I was referring to ISOs. There are hybrid ISOs that are both ISO and also IMG and will work with dd...
And I never balked at the cost/inconvenience of CDs and DVDs... I come from an era when CDs & DVD were cheap, and a USB large enough to hold an entire disk image was prohibitively expensive. It was cheaper for me to get an external USB DVD-RW drive, and spools of disks... Still have a spool or two laying around... Nowadays, you can get a 4GB flash drive for a few bucks... But I still have only used that capability sparingly, and only have 3-4 USBs with that kind of capacity. I guess my mind is still stuck in pre-2005...
|
|
|
|
10-09-2012, 10:45 PM
|
#8
|
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2006
Distribution: Mepis and Fedora, also Mandrake and SuSE PC-BSD Mint Solaris 11 express
Posts: 340
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JaseP
Not everyone uses K3B,... I wasn't talking about *.img files. I was referring to ISOs. There are hybrid ISOs that are both ISO and also IMG and will work with dd...
And I never balked at the cost/inconvenience of CDs and DVDs... I come from an era when CDs & DVD were cheap, and a USB large enough to hold an entire disk image was prohibitively expensive. It was cheaper for me to get an external USB DVD-RW drive, and spools of disks... Still have a spool or two laying around... Nowadays, you can get a 4GB flash drive for a few bucks... But I still have only used that capability sparingly, and only have 3-4 USBs with that kind of capacity. I guess my mind is still stuck in pre-2005...
|
The ISOs are used for DVDs and by unetbootin. Bresaro and Nero for linux can also burn discs. With RW disks, you aren't going to be spending money and get up to your neck in old distros and spins you no longer want or need.
The cli tool dd however will not make a bootable drive out of an ISO. It needs an img file. As far as a hybrid image goes, I have never used one. All mine are ISOs or img format.
To do a UNIX bootable drive, only an img file will work & dd must be used to make it. Unetbootin will go through the motions of making a UNIX USB. It'll look real pretty, but just won't boot.
Last edited by mdlinuxwolf; 10-10-2012 at 05:32 AM.
Reason: clear up dd
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:34 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|