Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
|
06-15-2006, 02:29 PM
|
#16
|
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: N. Kentucky
Distribution: Fedora 13 and Fedora 14
Posts: 46
Original Poster
Rep:
|
traceroute -p 25 googe.com
traceroute to googe.com (68.178.232.99), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
1 FL-ESR1-216-196-160-1.fuse.net (216.196.160.1) 9.477 ms 5.610 ms 5.882 ms
2 ws-osr1-g3-1.10.zoomtown.com (216.68.212.2) 6.645 ms 6.279 ms 6.587 ms
MPLS Label=432 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
3 sw2-g3-15.core.fuse.net (216.68.212.7) 5.768 ms 5.843 ms 6.135 ms
4 core4-g2-0.core.fuse.net (216.68.7.16) 5.926 ms 5.506 ms 6.135 ms
5 ge-5-1.hsa2.Cincinnati1.Level3.net (4.78.218.9) 12.588 ms 12.691 ms 12.683 ms
6 so-5-0-0.mp1.Cincinnati1.Level3.net (4.68.124.241) 12.748 ms 12.633 ms 12.263 ms
7 ae-0-0.bbr1.Chicago1.Level3.net (64.159.1.33) 22.648 ms so-2-0-1.bbr2.Chicago1.Level3.net (64.159.0.162) 12.578 ms ae-0-0.bbr1.Chicago1.Level3.net (64.159.1.33) 13.143 ms
8 ae-24-52.car4.Chicago1.Level3.net (4.68.101.40) 12.653 ms ae-14-53.car4.Chicago1.Level3.net (4.68.101.72) 12.358 ms ae-24-52.car4.Chicago1.Level3.net (4.68.101.40) 12.891 ms
9 att-level3-oc48.Chicago1.Level3.net (4.68.127.166) 31.384 ms att-level3-oc48.Chicago1.Level3.net (209.0.227.78) 32.566 ms 32.876 ms
10 tbr2-p012201.cgcil.ip.att.net (12.123.6.38) 53.091 ms 54.214 ms 54.570 ms
MPLS Label=31986 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
11 tbr2-cl7.sl9mo.ip.att.net (12.122.10.46) 53.165 ms 53.300 ms 54.103 ms
MPLS Label=31710 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
12 tbr1-cl24.sl9mo.ip.att.net (12.122.9.141) 51.812 ms 51.966 ms 50.981 ms
MPLS Label=31577 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
13 tbr2-cl6.dlstx.ip.att.net (12.122.10.90) 51.069 ms 51.302 ms 51.353 ms
MPLS Label=32509 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
14 tbr2-cl1592.phmaz.ip.att.net (12.122.10.82) 51.421 ms 51.063 ms 51.413 ms
MPLS Label=30828 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
15 12.123.206.29 (12.123.206.29) 49.589 ms 49.535 ms 48.701 ms
16 12.122.255.18 (12.122.255.18) 50.163 ms 49.543 ms 50.273 ms
17 mdf1-bi8k-2-eth-1-5.phx1.attens.net (63.241.129.142) 50.467 ms 50.693 ms 50.908 ms
18 63.241.142.126 (63.241.142.126) 49.152 ms 50.243 ms 49.721 ms
|
|
|
|
06-15-2006, 02:31 PM
|
#17
|
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: N. Kentucky
Distribution: Fedora 13 and Fedora 14
Posts: 46
Original Poster
Rep:
|
You know so much more than me, and I appreciate all you time and efforts.
|
|
|
|
06-15-2006, 02:37 PM
|
#18
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Knoxville, Tn (USA)
Distribution: OpenSUSE, Ubuntu
Posts: 250
Rep:
|
Unfortunantly, I don't have much more information for you right now. I will ask around and see if I can't some up with something. Keep an eye on this thread and I will let you know if I find out something. If you figure it out on your own, let me know becuase I'm kind of curious now.
Good Luck,
~Justin
|
|
|
|
06-15-2006, 02:45 PM
|
#19
|
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Maine, USA
Distribution: OpenSUSE, Gentoo, Fedora, Ubuntu, Mandriva, others
Posts: 413
Rep:
|
Rridler, I have found something interesting. I just tried doing a telnet to your server on port 25 and it did not get through. I would imagine that has something to do with the issue.
Code:
telnet> o
(to) ridler.homedns.org 25
Trying 216.196.163.43...
telnet: connect to address 216.196.163.43: Connection refused
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused
telnet>
The thing is though, that traceroute you did looks like it should be getting through.
Last edited by pdeman2; 06-15-2006 at 02:46 PM.
|
|
|
|
06-15-2006, 02:50 PM
|
#20
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Knoxville, Tn (USA)
Distribution: OpenSUSE, Ubuntu
Posts: 250
Rep:
|
Good call pdeman2, I just assumed that since HE could telnet to his machine that I could also. I can telnet to his port 80, but not to port 25. rridler, run
Code:
ps -aux | grep sendmail
to see if sendmail is actually running correctly. If it is, then it should look something like this:
Code:
[jeelliso@dada ~]$ ps -aux | grep sendmail
root 32353 0.0 0.0 8084 3116 ? Ss 14:27 0:00 sendmail: accepting connections
smmsp 32361 0.0 0.0 7136 2588 ? Ss 14:27 0:00 sendmail: Queue runner@01:00:00 for /var/spool/clientmqueue
jeelliso 32642 0.0 0.0 4872 636 pts/0 S+ 15:49 0:00 grep sendmail
Maybe we can fix this after all; I'm not giving up yet.
~Justin
|
|
|
|
06-15-2006, 03:14 PM
|
#21
|
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: N. Kentucky
Distribution: Fedora 13 and Fedora 14
Posts: 46
Original Poster
Rep:
|
root 2981 0.0 1.2 7960 2060 ? Ss 13:53 0:00 sendmail: accepting connections
smmsp 2989 0.0 1.0 6964 1664 ? Ss 13:53 0:00 sendmail: Queue runner@01:00:00 for /var/spool/clientmqueue
root 3815 0.0 0.4 4844 672 pts/1 S+ 16:17 0:00 grep sendmail
Last edited by rridler; 06-15-2006 at 04:41 PM.
|
|
|
|
06-28-2006, 10:09 AM
|
#22
|
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: N. Kentucky
Distribution: Fedora 13 and Fedora 14
Posts: 46
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Any more suggestions?
|
|
|
|
06-28-2006, 10:58 AM
|
#23
|
|
Moderator
Registered: May 2001
Posts: 24,805
|
Can you see if the messages you're trying to send are queued with the "mailq" command? If you do "echo "/mx pomeroy.com"|/usr/sbin/sendmail -bt" it should return the three mailserver addresses for the domain. Can you telnet to any and all of them on port 25?
|
|
|
|
06-28-2006, 12:02 PM
|
#24
|
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: N. Kentucky
Distribution: Fedora 13 and Fedora 14
Posts: 46
Original Poster
Rep:
|
echo "/mx pomeroy.com"|/usr/sbin/sendmail -bt
ADDRESS TEST MODE (ruleset 3 NOT automatically invoked)
Enter <ruleset> <address>
> getmxrr(pomeroy.com) returns 3 value(s):
mail.pomeroy.com.
mail1.pomeroy.com.
mail2.pomeroy.com.
|
|
|
|
06-28-2006, 12:06 PM
|
#25
|
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: N. Kentucky
Distribution: Fedora 13 and Fedora 14
Posts: 46
Original Poster
Rep:
|
telnet mail.pomeroy.com 25
Trying 216.68.84.41...
telnet: connect to address 216.68.84.41: No route to host
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: No route to host
telnet mail1.pomeroy.com 25
Trying 65.119.133.132...
telnet: connect to address 65.119.133.132: No route to host
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: No route to host
telnet mail2.pomeroy.com 25
Trying 216.68.84.101...
telnet: connect to address 216.68.84.101: No route to host
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: No route to host
|
|
|
|
06-28-2006, 01:59 PM
|
#26
|
|
Member
Registered: May 2006
Posts: 32
Rep:
|
Your ISP may be blocking or filtering port 25. You may need to set up a smart host in sendmail.
Check out this article
Setting up Smart Hosts with sendmail
Last edited by frankjoshua; 06-28-2006 at 02:18 PM.
|
|
|
|
07-13-2006, 01:23 PM
|
#27
|
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: N. Kentucky
Distribution: Fedora 13 and Fedora 14
Posts: 46
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thanks for all the help, but it does seem to be that my ISP does block port 25 and they don't allow use of port 25 unless I have a business class account with them. RATS!!!!!!!
So much for my own email account. RATS, RATS, RATS!!!!!!!!
Unless you have an other way to work around it...............................
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:42 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|