Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
i installed rh 7.2 on my thinkpad.. successfully enabled dual boot with nt.. the resolution when running linux is very poor.. well not very.. but poor.. all colors show.. everything is there but the text looks like MICRON.. sort of techmicron i believe.. its just not clear.. does anyone know the settings that i should have for this display..
What series and model of Thinkpad? You have to remember thinkpads went from 386sx's to yesterday's PIII. If you have the series and the model number, which can be found on the bottom of the machine, then you can track down all the TFT info from www.ibm.com. The graphics card info will also be helpful.
after some more brosing and tooling around i find that it is the fonts inside mozilla that are the worst.. when i look around i see that most are ok for the laptop.. but inside mozilla i see that the are almost basic .. they are not rounded.. they are very low resolution... any ideas what to check?\
Honestly, at the end of the file called XF86Config found in /etc/X11, there is a section labelled Display (or something like that). One of the entries is going to read
If its below 16, that's probably the problem. Depending on your card and your TFT, this can be either 16, 24, or 32, with a resolution of probably anything from 800x600 up to 1280x1024. However, in order to set that right you gotta find out what card is in it and what kind of TFT to make sure the rest of the XF86Config file is right. The autoconfigure utilites of RH setting X-windows are historic for guessing the settings of laptops wrong (its just much harder to do). All of this info is on the ibm website. I can find it for you really quick if you want, but I would have to have the model # from the machine. For instance, mine is a Thinkpad i1400 2454, with that last 4 digit number found on the bottom of the machine and what really narrows it down.
Dude, have you tried the new XFree 4.2, as of a few days ago I think? I poked around to see if Radeon support has gotten better as well... I'm about the only one I know that prefers them to Nvidia chipsets. I think the new mobile cards may be supported now.
Originally posted by finegan Dude, have you tried the new XFree 4.2, as of a few days ago I think? I poked around to see if Radeon support has gotten better as well... I'm about the only one I know that prefers them to Nvidia chipsets. I think the new mobile cards may be supported now.
nope, when i downloaded the latest version of xfree the only linux binary available was 4.1. i'd love to try it out, but i *just* got X working, and i'm not about to start fiddling with it again. :-)