LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 04-02-2013, 05:35 PM   #1
Jim Edwards
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2012
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
strange responses from 'make'


I'm trying to build a version of uClinux for an ST board. So far the steps have been successful. Now I'm told to '#make xconsole'. Instead of the expected response, I'm getting the error message 'Makefile:228: *** mixed implicit and normal rules. Stop.'. Does this mean that my version of make, installed by Fedora 17, is not complete? And what is the 228? These steps are all described in detail in many documents and the documents are very similar. The document I've been using is an app note from ST (AN3012), on the topic of how to prepare uClinux for the ST controller.

-- Jim

Last edited by Jim Edwards; 04-02-2013 at 06:02 PM.
 
Old 04-03-2013, 10:35 AM   #2
bigrigdriver
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: East Centra Illinois, USA
Distribution: Debian Squeeze
Posts: 5,764

Rep: Reputation: 306Reputation: 306Reputation: 306Reputation: 306
Quote:
message 'Makefile:228: *** mixed implicit and normal rules. Stop.'
Here is a thread that discusses the Makefile:228 error and what to do about it.
The 228 refers to the line number in the makefile.
 
Old 04-04-2013, 03:33 PM   #3
Jim Edwards
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2012
Posts: 5

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I took a good look at the thread you sent. It's probably very close to what I need to solve my problem, but I don't understand enough about the language used by make. So --- I spent a few hours researching make, and reading all that I could find. All I can say now is that indeed it seems as though make files have changed over the years, and that some have followed different rules. Are you able to examine the attached file to determine whether it's something I can change myself?

I have attached the Makefile I'm trying to use, although I had to add the .txt extension to make it acceptable the the attachment process.

Thanks.

--Jim
Attached Files
File Type: txt Makefile.txt (13.0 KB, 9 views)
 
Old 04-04-2013, 04:25 PM   #4
Jim Edwards
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2012
Posts: 5

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
After sending my recent response, I was able to find two lines which had to be modified. 'make' ran the Makefile properly. Thanks again for your efforts. You have saved me a lot of time.

-- Jim
 
  


Reply

Tags
make


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
a strange make rule George2 Programming 3 08-28-2006 12:30 PM
Help - strange problems with kernel headers and 'make' -=Graz=- Ubuntu 6 05-24-2006 06:54 AM
Strange Identd Responses thecrazydood Linux - Networking 0 11-01-2005 07:13 PM
strange error during make of gd-library anttu Linux - Software 3 09-16-2004 04:45 AM
a strange make error bosewicht Linux - Newbie 1 04-04-2004 05:34 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:07 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration