LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-13-2007, 07:52 PM   #1
BlahBlah_X
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2006
Posts: 70

Rep: Reputation: 15
Software to take care of source packages


I am running Ulteo, an Ubuntu based system that uses apt and .deb. I was wondering if there is a tool that will manage packages in tar.gz format (source).

Is there such a tool? Does it resolve dependencies? If so, what is the website?

Thank you.
 
Old 04-13-2007, 08:33 PM   #2
bigrigdriver
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: East Centra Illinois, USA
Distribution: Debian stable
Posts: 5,908

Rep: Reputation: 356Reputation: 356Reputation: 356Reputation: 356
I can think of two such packages off the top of my head: stow and encap.

Neither one has dependency handling.

Both work in similar fashion. A folder is created under /usr/local (called stow or encap depending on which one you use). When you install a .src package, you run ./configure and make normally, then invoke the package handler to finish the process: stow <packagename> or epkg <packagename>. Each will create a sub-folder of /usr/local/stow (encap) with all components of the package, then symlink to the standard locations for the components. Upgrading src packages can be done: the package handler detects the installed version, and upgrades to the newer version.

The most notable user of encap is LFS (Linux From Scratch).

You can find out more here:
http://freshmeat.net/projects/gnustow/
http://www.encap.org/
 
Old 04-14-2007, 05:25 AM   #3
BlahBlah_X
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2006
Posts: 70

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Are you sure there are no tools like this that resolve dependencies?
 
Old 04-14-2007, 05:44 AM   #4
almatic
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 547

Rep: Reputation: 67
just make a .deb package out of them using checkinstall. However, if you want it to handle dependencies you have to add that manually. Apt cannot know the dependencies if you don't tell it ...
 
Old 04-14-2007, 08:00 AM   #5
pixellany
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Distribution: Mint
Posts: 17,809

Rep: Reputation: 743Reputation: 743Reputation: 743Reputation: 743Reputation: 743Reputation: 743Reputation: 743
The tool that resolves dependencies is the package manager. When you use the distro's package manager to install SW, it keeps track of what is installed, and goes to the repository to get any required files for whatever you want to install.
In general, if you want to install SW without using the package manager, then you have to go find all the files needed (dependencies)

In the nitpick department, .tar.gz is not synonymous with source code---that format could contain anything.

I thought Ulteo was based on Mandrake/Mandriva (maybe because is it Gael Duval's project??) Does it use the Ubuntu/Debian repositories?
 
Old 04-14-2007, 08:37 AM   #6
Jaqui
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Distribution: LFS, SLak, Gentoo, Debian
Posts: 291

Rep: Reputation: 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixellany
I thought Ulteo was based on Mandrake/Mandriva (maybe because is it Gael Duval's project??) Does it use the Ubuntu/Debian repositories?
Is that similiar to me thinking PCLinuxOS is the "unnatural" offspring of Debian and Mandriva because of the DrakXtools and Synaptic they used?
[ I checked, PCLinuxOS is Texstar based. ]


Dependencies, the number one bane of all *x users, made worse by automatic dependency checking tools. I'm sorry, stupid things like saying the optional kde-edu package is an absolutely required package to have KDE installed because some twit packager for the distro can't live without the children's educational games on his [ or her ] computer does not make automatic dependency checking a good thing. It actually makes any automatic package management tools extremely bad things in my book.
[ LFS is the best, no bloatware dependencies unless YOU want them ]
 
Old 04-14-2007, 10:02 AM   #7
pixellany
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Distribution: Mint
Posts: 17,809

Rep: Reputation: 743Reputation: 743Reputation: 743Reputation: 743Reputation: 743Reputation: 743Reputation: 743
Quote:
Is that similiar to me thinking PCLinuxOS is the "unnatural" offspring of Debian and Mandriva because of the DrakXtools and Synaptic they used?
[ I checked, PCLinuxOS is Texstar based. ]
Huh?????
Texstar (pseudonym) is the AUTHOR of PCLOS
 
Old 04-14-2007, 11:43 AM   #8
almatic
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 547

Rep: Reputation: 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaqui
IDependencies, the number one bane of all *x users, made worse by automatic dependency checking tools. I'm sorry, stupid things like saying the optional kde-edu package is an absolutely required package to have KDE installed because some twit packager for the distro can't live without the children's educational games
then you probably installed a meta-package (like kde-base, kde-extras, kde-desktop or whatever they are named). They show you all packages they are going to install beforehand, if you don't like what they install you still have the option to install all single packages manually.
If dependencies for a package are 'bloated' with stuff that is not required, then the corresponding package mantainer is the one to complain to, because he determines, what's required, recommended ... for his package, the package-manager-tool just reads that out.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
open source/free statistical software packages odysseus.lost Linux - Software 5 06-06-2013 12:43 AM
software for compiling source packages hdo781 Debian 4 02-16-2007 10:54 AM
Why do audio packages care about Firefox? Jessica9 Linux - Software 1 06-09-2005 02:33 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:47 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration