Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
Hi guys, I use a SuSE Linux 10.0 and I partitioned the hard disk on ReiserFS format.
The functioning of Linux is extremely slow compared to that of Windows, which uses FAT32/ NTFS. I tried migrating to ext2, ext3 partitions, too, but, the system was still slow. My swap is totally 3GB. My main system specifications: 80GB SATA hardrive, AMD Athlon 3200+ 64 bits processor, 256 MB RAM. I don't think the low speed is due to 256 MB RAM, because when I tried running SuSE on a machine with 512 MB RAM and remaining specifications remaining same, the performance was same.
I initially thought that it was due to heavy-weight KDE, but I have used light weight desktop environments like window maker and FVWM, but both of them yield the same performance as KDE.
Is there any method to increase the speed of functioning of the system, while using SuSE Linux?
I run KDE 3.5 on Mandriva 2007 with 256 MB RAM and the speed is fast.
Check your machine "services" and see what's running or started during bootup of your SuSE box. There are a lot of services that start at bootup by default that hog all the memory and CPU resources such as AV updates, e-mail retreival, looking for various network connections, etc. BTW does SuSE use KAT for an indexing service ? This is a known killer for desktop speed.
(to Cara25): But, is it as fast as any other operating system like Windows or MacOSX? I am a very good supporter of free OS' like linux and FreeBSD, but my rising concern is that is it as fast as the above mentioned proprietary OS'?
In 1st 2/3 months I feel little bit slow if compare to windows, after 1/2 years KDE will become faster than windows. Why? Windows registry cause windows slow down. If you want to make kde faster, can use ram disk. It should be fastest, but you need to hack yourself.
Thats funny, I have SuSE 10.0 running on a 256 MB PIII machine as my gateway. I even tunnel through with VNC (with very nice results) and the only performance problem I get is when I have to perform a selection on the desktop (that transparent selection box is quite slow).
I also have it now on my 64bit machine with SuSE 10.0 x86_64. I have no problems, except the selection box again. I definately can't wait for the KDE 4 to reach our desktops on SuSE!
@Cara25: What's that about a KAT? I'm also open for removing unnecessary stuff for greater performance!
To Last Attacker,
Kat was a search or find program that indexed the entire hard drive. My first experience with it was on my 2006 Mandriva install, it was automatically loaded by default on the initial install. It took all my memory and CPU resources during an index of the hard drive files. After hearing from many other readers of this forum, I uninstalled it and my machine ran much better. The program KAT has good intentions, it's just a bad design with very poor configuration options.
@ Carra25: No such software as KAT is there with SuSE 10.0
I made few performance tweaks and got it alright: -
1) installed kernelsmpw for AMD_64 Athlon processors
2) added noatime attribute to all linux filesystems
3) (re)configured runtime-levels as per my needs
4) changed value of VM/over_commit memory, under vm/swapping, in powertweak to one.
Before these tweaks, I always had just 10-20 MB's of RAM (with no visible processes like konqueror/amarok open) whereas now with Konqueror, Firefox, Gimp,GKrellM open, in KDE, 99MB RAM is still free.
Does anybody know if XGL-3D would work smoothly on a 64-bit PC with 256 MB RAM, 32 MB Graphics Card?
"In this open world without a fence, who wants Bill(ed) Gates?"