LinuxQuestions.org
Did you know LQ has a Linux Hardware Compatibility List?
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 09-15-2005, 02:20 AM   #1
Azhrarn
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 63

Rep: Reputation: 15
Simple backup system


Hi there,
I m pretty new to the Linux game, and being used to Windows, I like a simple life ;-)
I got a Red Hat 9 server up & running, with tape drive and all (thx michaelk!!!).

Anyway, I have a single file server running Samba, onto which the Win office users keep their files. I need a backup system which allows me to keep track of what is on the tape, and also which allows multiple tapes per backup (full backup is 10 tapes, incremental is 1).

However there seems to be no need for the complex structure of Amanda.

Can anyone suggest a possible, more simple alternative?
Perhaps with a GUI for configuration? :P
Thanks!

Paul
 
Old 09-16-2005, 02:24 PM   #2
bigrigdriver
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: East Centra Illinois, USA
Distribution: Debian Squeeze
Posts: 5,739

Rep: Reputation: 298Reputation: 298Reputation: 298
I would suggest DAR (and possibly KDAR). Dar is a set of bash scripts plus a bit of binary code; kdar is the gui frontend to dar (or maybe a gui equivalent of dar). I've used Dar to backup a 7 gig installation (compressed, it's a 2.7 gig file). I haven't used kdar yet.

You can learn more about Dar here .

Advantages of Dar: unlike Parted, which requires that backups must be restored to partitions of the same size, Dar doesn't care about partition sizes. Unlike tar, which makes one large file (compressed or not), Dar makes a large file of individual files. If one file is corrupt in a tar archive, you risk loosing the entire file. With a Dar archive, you risk only one file; the corrupt one. And, if the file is a text or spreadsheed file, you can "skip over" the corrupt portion and recover most of the file, and rebuild the missing part form local documents (hopefully, if you keep them).

Disadvantage of Dar: it takes a bit of study and trial until you find out what works for you. But, when you do figure it out, WOW!

I searched for 4 years for a backup solution to do what I wanted to do, always skipping over Dar in my Google searches. Finally, in desperation, I tried Dar. And there it was, all along.

Making backups is as easy as invoking a bash script (manually or via cron); making restorations is equally easy. Just be mindful that Dar backups are relative to the root of the filesystem (if you set it up that way). Therefore restores must also be relative to the root of the filesystem.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Simple help with a backup script GraemeK Linux - Software 1 05-20-2005 11:43 PM
simple-backup-script ahmed4linux Linux - General 1 05-04-2005 07:10 PM
simple MySQL backup Thulemanden Linux - Software 1 02-09-2004 03:03 PM
Simple way to backup my laptop enine Linux - General 2 02-04-2004 01:00 PM
Simple Gui Tape Backup + RH 7.2 chosmer Linux - General 0 08-12-2002 12:02 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:11 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration