LinuxQuestions.org
Visit the LQ Articles and Editorials section
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 11-09-2004, 04:16 PM   #1
Rockgod2099
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago
Distribution: Fedora Core 2
Posts: 32

Rep: Reputation: 15
Question Scribus installation problem, sez I need automake 1.6 when automake 1.9 is istalled


I've been trying to install scribus 1.2, I have no problems with the configuration, but when I do make, I get a message that sez

[root@uac-182-86 scribus-1.2]# make
cd . && \
/bin/sh /home/rockgod/Guts/scribus-1.2/admin/missing --run automake-1.6 --foreign Makefile
/home/rockgod/Guts/scribus-1.2/admin/missing: line 46: automake-1.6: command not found
WARNING: `automake-1.6' is needed, and you do not seem to have it handy on your
system. You might have modified some files without having the
proper tools for further handling them. Check the `README' file,
it often tells you about the needed prerequirements for installing
this package. You may also peek at any GNU archive site, in case
some other package would contain this missing `automake-1.6' program.
make: *** [Makefile.in] Error 1

So I went and downloaded and installed the latest copy of automake (1.9) but I still get this message. Any ideas on why this is? I also tried using using yum to install scribus but I keep getting told that yum couldn't find scribus

[root@uac-182-86 scribus-1.2]# yum install scribus
Gathering header information file(s) from server(s)
Server: Fedora Core 2 - i386 - Base
Server: Fedora Core 2 - i386 - Released Updates
Finding updated packages
Downloading needed headers
Cannot find a package matching scribus
No actions to take


Any help would be appreciated
 
Old 11-09-2004, 06:11 PM   #2
kevinatkins
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: cheshire, uk
Distribution: Ubuntu Hoary
Posts: 605

Rep: Reputation: 32
hi,

this migh be down to your environment variables.. Could you do a couple of quick tests for us and post back the output? ...

In a console, try :

'which automake' (omit quotes!)

- this should show where automake is installed...

then -

'automake --version'

- self-explanatory.

Cheers.
 
Old 11-10-2004, 01:45 PM   #3
Rockgod2099
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago
Distribution: Fedora Core 2
Posts: 32

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
I did what you said and got this:

[rockgod@uac-182-86 rockgod]$ which automake
/usr/local/bin/automake
[rockgod@uac-182-86 rockgod]$ automake--version
bash: automake--version: command not found
[rockgod@uac-182-86 rockgod]$ automake-1.9
automake-1.9: `configure.ac' or `configure.in' is required
[rockgod@uac-182-86 rockgod]$ automake --version
automake (GNU automake) 1.9
Written by Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>.

Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Does this help? Any ideas on why Scribus won't install?
 
Old 11-10-2004, 01:55 PM   #4
kevinatkins
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: cheshire, uk
Distribution: Ubuntu Hoary
Posts: 605

Rep: Reputation: 32
hi,

is there an 'automake' symbolic link pointing to automake-1.9? and did you uninstall the original automake? this is kind of puzzling...
 
Old 11-10-2004, 09:21 PM   #5
Rockgod2099
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago
Distribution: Fedora Core 2
Posts: 32

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
I don't remember ever uninstalling any version of auto-make, I don't know how I would do that, how would I tell if there is a symbolic link pointing to automake 1.9? Should I have a link or get rid of one if there is?
 
Old 11-11-2004, 03:56 AM   #6
kevinatkins
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: cheshire, uk
Distribution: Ubuntu Hoary
Posts: 605

Rep: Reputation: 32
Hello,

Regarding symbolic links, etc..

Have a look in /usr/bin and check if there's any automake link in there - if there is, where is it pointing.. Hopefully to your new version, if not, make a note of where it points and rename it something like automake.old.

next, have a go at creating a symbolic link in pointing to your new automake version, eg, as root type -

Code:
ln -s /usr/local/bin/automake-1.9 /usr/bin/automake
Other than that, I'm a bit stuck!
 
Old 11-11-2004, 07:07 AM   #7
dezza
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Denmark
Distribution: ArchLinux, Debian
Posts: 129

Rep: Reputation: 18
Hey you should check this out! It explains it all! Scribus is one of the best tools for Linux i love it!

http://docs.scribus.net/index.php?la...&page=install1
http://docs.scribus.net/index.php?la...&page=install3

Good luck ..
 
Old 11-11-2004, 01:04 PM   #8
Rockgod2099
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago
Distribution: Fedora Core 2
Posts: 32

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
I made a symbolic link, and still get the same "need auto-make 1.6" error. I then went to the links that dezza suggested. It still tells me that I have auto-make 1.9 when I type automake --version. I then tried

export WANT_AUTOMAKE="1.9" and the make still won't work.

I then tried the

export WANT_AUTOMAKE="1.6"

make still told me I needed automake 1.6

should I just install an older version of auto-make? roll back from 1.9 to 1.6?
 
Old 11-11-2004, 01:07 PM   #9
Rockgod2099
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago
Distribution: Fedora Core 2
Posts: 32

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Oh and this appears at the end of the configuration script. do you think this means anything?

Configuration Summary:

FreeType2 installed: Yes
CUPS installed: No
LittleCMS installed: No
TiffLib installed: No
The Scripter-Plugin will not be compiled.

Start make now.
 
Old 11-11-2004, 02:45 PM   #10
kevinatkins
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: cheshire, uk
Distribution: Ubuntu Hoary
Posts: 605

Rep: Reputation: 32
Hi,

OK, must admit to being a little puzzled here...

The lines at the end of your config script summary are alright (although if you've got CUPS on your system, it might be worth installing the CUPS development libraries so that CUPS support gets compiled in... but that's an aside for now)

Anyway, I decided to have a go at compiling Scribus 1.2 on my system, to see if I could reproduce any of the issues you've got. Well, it's compiled fine, and I've got automake 1.4 on this box! So the version business is a bit of a red herring I think.

What I'm starting to wonder is whether your development environment is either incomplete or broken in some other way. When you installed the latest automake version, did you compile it from source or use an RPM (its location in /usr/local/bin suggests to me that you compiled it?)
 
Old 11-11-2004, 03:17 PM   #11
Rockgod2099
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago
Distribution: Fedora Core 2
Posts: 32

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
yea I downloaded a tar of automake and uncompressed it. no rpms.

I used to have a problem doing the configuration with scribus because I didn't have C++ but I got it using yum and now I start running into problems when I type make
 
Old 11-11-2004, 05:23 PM   #12
kevinatkins
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: cheshire, uk
Distribution: Ubuntu Hoary
Posts: 605

Rep: Reputation: 32
Hi,

This is getting intriguing and I've got to admit I'm not in the best position to advise further! I'm hoping some other people might be able to help out here, but for what it's worth...

Have you got autoconf on your system? I think that automake requires it, but I'd imagine you'd have run into that dependency when you compiled automake anyway..

there may be other issues or requirements about which I'm not aware, too. One other suggestion - if you've got a fedora cd set, you'll probably find all of the development tools on there and it might be easier to try that..

Good luck and I'm sorry I can't really be of further assistance!
 
Old 11-11-2004, 11:22 PM   #13
Rockgod2099
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago
Distribution: Fedora Core 2
Posts: 32

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
well thanks for you help thus far, hopefully I'll be able to figure something out....
 
Old 11-14-2004, 06:37 PM   #14
Rockgod2099
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago
Distribution: Fedora Core 2
Posts: 32

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
[http-download.fedora.us-fedora-fedora-2-i386-RPMS.stable-]
name=http-download.fedora.us-fedora-fedora-2-i386-RPMS.stable-
baseurl=http://download.fedora.us/fedora/fedora/2/i386/RPMS.stable/

Put that at the end of your /etc/yum.conf file and (as root) type:
yum install scribus

I had to run yum install scribus twice in order to get it working but it did.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A problem about autoconf and automake icoming Programming 1 06-02-2005 02:52 AM
automake version problem davidsrsb Slackware 1 02-23-2005 10:09 PM
automake problem!!!help!! ngan_yine Linux - Newbie 3 01-13-2004 08:20 AM
slackware 9 asking for automake 1.6 while i have automake 1.7 gtgoku Slackware 1 10-19-2003 08:59 AM
GiFT automake installation errors Canadian_2k2 Linux - Networking 0 01-05-2003 02:22 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:52 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration